skip to main content
10.1145/506443.506646acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Usability in practice: field methods evolution and revolution

Published:20 April 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Field Methods are a collection of tools and techniques for conducting studies of users, their tasks, and their work environments in the actual context of those environments. The promise of such methods is that they help teams design products that are both useful and usable by providing data about what people really do. Participants in this forum will address:

  • the origins and framework of Contextual Design

  • the application of field methods to task analysis

  • a review of ways to adapt these methods to practical constraints

  • a discount approach to field studies

.

References

  1. Anschuetz, L., Hinderer, D., and Rohn, J. A. (1998). "When the Field is Far Afield Multiple-Country Observations of Complex System Use." UPA 98 Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bugental, J.O., and Rosenbaum, S. (1998). "Combining Usability Testing and Documentation for User Support." ErgoCon '98 Proceedings.Bauersfeld K., Halgren S. You've Got Three Days!" Case Studies in Field Techniques for the Time-Challenged. (1996). In Wixon D., Ramey J. (Eds) Field Methods Casebook for Software Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 177--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Beyer H. R., Holtzblatt K. (1995). Apprenticing With the Customer. Communications of the ACM, 38 (5), p. 45--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Beyer H., Holtzblatt K. Contextual Design. Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brown D. S. (1996). The Challenges of User-Based Design in a Medical Equipment Market. In Wixon D., Ramey J. (Editors) Field Methods Casebook for Software Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 157--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Card S. K., Mackinlay J. D., Shneiderman B. (1999). Readings in Information Visualization. Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cooper, A., (1999). The Inmates are Running the Asylum. New York: Macmillian. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Curtis P. et al. (1999). Customer-Focused Design Data in a Large, Multi-Site Organization. CHI 99 Conf. Proc., ACM, New York, p. 608--615. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Goodwin K. (2001) Goal-Directed Methods for Great Design. CHI 2001 Tutorial Notes, ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hackos J. T., Redish J. C. (1998). User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Holtzblatt, K. and Beyer, H. (1999). Contextual Design. Interactions, 6. 1, 32--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Owen R. N., Baecker R. M., Harrison B. (1994). Timelines, a Tool for the Gathering, Coding and Analysis of Temporal HCI Usability Data. CHI 94 Conference Companion, ACM, New York, p. 7--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. "Nielsen, J. (1989b). Usability engineering at a discount. In Salvendy, G., and Smith, M.J. (Eds.), Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. 394--401. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rosenbaum. S. (2000). Not Just a Hammer: When and how to employ multiple methods in usability programs. UPA 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sanderson P. M., McNeese M., Zaff B. (1994). Knowledge elicitation and observation in engineering psychology: MacSHAPA and COGENT. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 26, p. 117--124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Whiteside, J., Bennett, J., and Holtzblatt, K. (1988). Usability engineering: Our experience and evolution. In Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 791--817.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilkinson N. M. (1995). Using CRC Cards: An Informal Approach to Object-Oriented Development. SIGS Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Wiklund, Michael E., (Ed.), (1997). Usability in Practice: How Companies Develop User-Friendly Products, Boston: Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Wixon, D. and Ramey, J, (Eds.), (1996). Field Methods Casebook for Software Design, New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Wood, L., (1996). 'The Ethnographic Interview in User-Centered Work/Task Analysis.' In Field Methods Casebook for Software Design. Wixon, D. and Ramey, J. (Eds.). New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '02: CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2002
    488 pages
    ISBN:1581134541
    DOI:10.1145/506443

    Copyright © 2002 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 20 April 2002

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI '24
    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 11 - 16, 2024
    Honolulu , HI , USA

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader