skip to main content
10.1145/509907.509985acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Relations between average case complexity and approximation complexity

Published:19 May 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

We investigate relations between average case complexity and the complexity of approximation. Our preliminary findings indicate that this is a research direction that leads to interesting insights. Under the assumption that refuting 3SAT is hard on average on a natural distribution, we derive hardness of approximation results for min bisection, dense k-subgraph, max bipartite clique and the 2-catalog segmentation problem. No NP-hardness of approximation results are currently known for these problems.

References

  1. M. Ajtai. "Generating hard instances of lattice problems". In Proceedengs of 28th STOC, 1996, 99--108.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Alon, U. Feige, A. Widgerson, D. Zuckerman. "Derandomized graph products". Computational Complexity 5 (1995) 60--75.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Paul Beame, Richard Karp, Toni Pitassi, Mike Saks. "On the complexity of unsatisfiability proofs for random k-CNF formulas". In Proc. 30th STOC, 1998, 561--571.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Eli Ben-Sasson, Avi Wigderson. "Short proofs are narrow -- resolution made simple". In Proc. 31st STOC, 1999, 517--526.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. V. Chvatal, E. Szemeredi. "Many hard examples for resolution". JACM, 35(4), 1988, 759--768.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Y. Dodis, V. Guruswami, S. Khanna. "The 2-catalog segmentation problem". In Proc. of SODA 1999, 897--898.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Uriel Feige, Guy Kortsarz, and David Peleg. "The dense $k$-subgraph problem". Algorithmica (2001) 29: 410--421.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. U. Feige and R. Krauthgamer. "A polylogarithmic approximation of the minimum bisection". Proc. of 41st FOCS 2000, 105--115.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Uriel Feige and Michael Langberg. "Approximation algorithms for maximization problems arising in graph partitioning". Journal of Algorithms 41, 174--211 (2001).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ehud Friedgut. "Necessary and sufficient conditions for sharp thresholds of graph properties and the k-SAT problem". Journal of the American (MATH)ematical Society 12, 1999, 1017--1054.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Joel Friedman, Andreas Geordt. "Recognizing more unsatisfiable random 3SAT instances efficiently". In Proc. 28th ICALP, 2001, 310--321.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Andreas Geordt, Michael Krivelevich. "Efficient recognition of unsatisfiable random k-SAT instances by spectral methods". In Proc. of STACS 2001, 294--304.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Goemans and D. Williamson. "Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming". JACM 42:1115--1145, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Johan Hastad. "Some optimal inapproximability results". Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, El Paso, Texas, 1997, 1--10.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Karloff, U. Zwick. "A 7/8-approximation algorithm for MAX 3SAT?" In Proc. 38th FOCS, 1997, 406--415.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Kleinberg, C. Papadimitriou, P. Raghavan. "Segmentation problems: a micro-economic view of data mining". In Proc. 30th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 473--482, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. T. Leighton, S. Rao. "Multicommodity max-flow min-cut theorems and their use in designing approximation algorithms". JACM 46(6):787--832, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. L. Levin. "Average case complete problems". SICOMP 15, 1986, 285--286.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Mitzenmacher. "On the hardness of finding multiple preset dictionaries". In Proceedings of the 2001 Data Compression Conference, 411--418.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Alex Samorodnitsky, Luca Trevisan. "A PCP Characterization of NP with Optimal Amortized Query Complexity". Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Portland, Oregon, 2000, 191--199.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H. U. Simon. "On approximate solutions for combinatorial optimization problems". SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods, 3:294--310, 1990.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. "Phase Transitions in Combinatorial Problems." Theoretical Computer Science, Volume 265, Numbers 1-2. Guest Editors: O. Dubios, R. Monasson, B. Selma, R. Zecchina. Elsevier.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Uri Zwick. "Approximation algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems involving at most three variables per constraint". In Proc 9th SODA, 1998, 201--210.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Uri Zwick. "Outward rotations: a tool for rounding solutions of semidefinite programming relaxations, with applications to MAX CUT and other problems". In Proc. 31st STOC, 1999, 679--687.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Relations between average case complexity and approximation complexity

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          STOC '02: Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
          May 2002
          840 pages
          ISBN:1581134959
          DOI:10.1145/509907

          Copyright © 2002 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 May 2002

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          STOC '02 Paper Acceptance Rate91of287submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

          Upcoming Conference

          STOC '24
          56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
          June 24 - 28, 2024
          Vancouver , BC , Canada

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader