skip to main content
10.1145/512161.512169acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

R-tree-based data migration and self-tuning strategies in shared-nothing spatial databases

Published:09 November 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to provide fast and timely answers to queries in the context of spatial databases and GIS, we present our solution for effective data migration and tuning strategies in shared-nothing parallel spatial databases. Our purpose is to improve the performance of the indexes. Our approach has the following features. First, our scheme is self-tuning, dynamic as well as query-centric and it can adapt to dynamically changing user access patterns. Second, a global distributed R-tree-based indexing method is employed to facilitate effective data migration. Third, unlike traditional partitioning strategies where each processing element (PE) contains data from a single region of space, we allow each PE to store data from multiple and disjoint regions. This minimizes overlap in regions as well as coverage.We implemented the proposed scheme and conducted an extensive performance study on Fujitsu's AP3000 machine with 32 workstations using real datasets. Our experimental results show that our load-balancing strategy can distribute the load effectively across the PEs in the system, thereby reducing response times of incoming queries.

References

  1. T. E. Anderson, D. E. Culler, and D. A. Paterson. A case for now network of workstations. IEEE Micro, 15(1):pages 54--64, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Guttman. R-trees: A dynamic index structure for spatial searching. Proc. ACM SIGMOD, pages 47--57, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. I. Kamel and C. Faloutsos. Parallel r-trees. Proc. ACM SIGMOD, pages 195--204, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M.L. Lee, M. Kitsuregawa, B.C. Ooi, K.L. Tan, and A. Mondal. Towards self-tuning data placement in parallel database systems. Proc. ACM SIGMOD, pages 225--236, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Mondal, B.C. Ooi, K.L. Tan, M. Kitsuregawa, and M.L. Lee. Query-centric load-balancing using r-trees in shared-nothing spatial databases. Unpublished manuscript, Available from the AUTHORs, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Zou and B. Salzberg. On-line reorganization of sparsely-populated b+ trees. Proc. ACM SIGMOD, pages 115--124, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. R-tree-based data migration and self-tuning strategies in shared-nothing spatial databases

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  GIS '01: Proceedings of the 9th ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems
                  November 2001
                  184 pages
                  ISBN:1581134436
                  DOI:10.1145/512161

                  Copyright © 2001 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 9 November 2001

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader