skip to main content
10.1145/512360.512396acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The relationship between IT professionals' individual factors, training climate fit, and turnover intentions

Published:14 May 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Employers have been forced to use more and more creative methods to retain their most skilled IT professionals, as is aimed at helping the IT professional keep their skills current in the fast-paced, dynamic IT environment. Instrumentation has been developed for this study to measure the "fit" between an organization's offerings of training resources and the IT professional's perceived training needs. As such "training climate fit" is conceptualized as a sub-dimension of person-organization fit. A structural equation model is proposed to investigate the relationship between the IT professional's individual factors of self-efficacy, locus of control, training climate fit, and turnover intentions.

References

  1. Agarwal, Ritu and Ferratt, Thomas W. (2000). Retention and the career motives of IT professionals. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR Conference, April 6--8, 2000, pp. 158--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Compeau, Deborah; Olfman, Lorne; Sein, Maung; and Webster, June 1995). End user training and learning. Communications of the ACM, 38(7), July 1995, pp. 24--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Davern, Michael J. (1996). When good fit is bad: the dynamics of perceived fit. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Information Systems, December 16--18, 1996. Cleveland, Ohio, pp. 112--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Goodhue, Dale L. and Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 213--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Greeno, J. G.; Moore, J. L.; and Smith, D. R. (1993). "Transfer of situated learning" in D. K. Detterman and R. J. Sternberg, editors, Transfer on trial: intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Igbaria, M. and Greenhaus, J. H. (1992). The career advancement prospects of managers and professionals: are MIS employees unique? Decision Sciences, 23(2), pp. 478--499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lefcourt, H. M.; Von Bayer, C. L.; Ware, E. E.; Cox, D. J. (1979). Multidimensional-multiattributional causality scale: the development of a goal-specific locus of control scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 11, pp. 286--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Leidner, D. E. and Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The use of information technology to enhance management school education: a theoretical view. MIS Quarterly, 19(3), pp. 265--291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Pervin, L. A. (1968). Performance and satisfaction as a function of individual employment fit. Psychological Bulletin, 69, pp. 56--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Rasch, R. H. and Tosi, H. L. (1992). Factors affecting software developers' performance: an integrated approach. MIS Quarterly, 16, pp. 395--413. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: a study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, pp. 389--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ryan, Sherry D. (1999). A model of the motivation for IT retraining. Information Resources Management Journal, 12(4), pp. 24--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Sein, M. K.; Bostrom, R. P.; Olfman, L. (1999). Rethinking end-user training strategy: applying a hierarchical knowledge-level model. Journal of End User Computing, 11(1), pp. 32--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sherer, M. and Adams, C. H. (1983). Construct validation of the self-efficacy scale. Psychological Reports, 53, pp. 899--902.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 6(4), pp. 335--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Wood, R. and Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), pp. 361--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCPR '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research
    May 2002
    184 pages
    ISBN:1581134665
    DOI:10.1145/512360

    Copyright © 2002 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 May 2002

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGCPR '02 Paper Acceptance Rate15of32submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader