skip to main content
10.1145/513400.513440acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Projective clustering in high dimensions using core-sets

Published:05 June 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

(MATH) Let P be a set of n points in $\Red, and for any integer 0kd--1, let $\RDk(P) denote the minimum over all k-flats $\FLAT$ of maxP Dist(p,\FLAT). We present an algorithm that computes, for any 0 < ε < 1, a k-flat that is within a distance of (1 + $egr;) \RDk(P) from each point of P. The running time of the algorithm is dnO(k/ε5log(1/ε)). The crucial step in obtaining this algorithm is a structural result that says that there is a near-optimal flat that lies in an affine subspace spanned by a small subset of points in P. The size of this "core-set" depends on k and ε but is independent of the dimension.This approach also extends to the case where we want to find a k-flat that is close to a prescribed fraction of the entire point set, and to the case where we want to find j flats, each of dimension k, that are close to the point set. No efficient approximation schemes were known for these problems in high-dimensions, when k>1 or j>1.

References

  1. D. Achlioptas. Database-friendly random projections. In Proc. 20th ACM Sympos. Principles Database Syst., pages 274--281, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Alon, S. Dar, M. Parnas, and D. Ron. Testing of clustering. In Proc. 41th Annu. IEEE Sympos. Found. Comput. Sci., 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P.K. Agarwal and C.M. Procopiuc. Approximation algorithms for projective clustering. In Proc. 11th ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms, pages 538--547, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. I. Barany and Z. Furedi Computing the volume is difficult. In Discrete Comput. Geom. 2, 319--326, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Bern and D. Eppstein. Approximation algorithms for geometric problems. In D.S. Hochbaum, editor, Approximationg algorithms for NP-Hard problems. PWS Publishing Company, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Barequet and S. Har-Peled. Efficiently approximating the minimum-volume bounding box of a point set in three dimensions. J. Algorithms, 38:91--109, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Badoiu, S. Har-Peled, and P. Indyk. Approximate clustering via core-sets. To appear in STOC 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Brieden and P. Gritzmann and V. Klee. Inapproximability of some geometric and quadratic optimization problems. In P. M. Pardalos, editor, Approximation and Complexity in Numerical Optimization: Continuous and Discrete Problems, pages 96--115, Kluwer, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, and D.G. Stork. Pattern Classification. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2nd edition, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Gritzmann and V. Klee. Inner and outer j-radii of convex bodies in finite-dimensional normed spaces. Discrete Comput. Geom., 7:255--280, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Gritzmann and V. Klee. Computational complexity of inner and outer $j$-radii of polytopes in finite-dimensional normed spaces. Math. Program., 59:163--213, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Gritzmann and V. Klee. On the complexity of some basic problems in computational convexity: I. containment problems. Discrete Math., 136:129--174, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Grötschel, L. Lovász, and A. Schrijver. Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization, volume 2 of Algorithms and Combinatorics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2nd edition, 1988. 2nd edition 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Har-Peled. Clustering motion. In Proc. 42nd Annu. IEEE Sympos. Found. Comput. Sci., pages 84--93, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Har-Peled and K.R. Varadarajan. Approximate shape fitting via linearization. In Proc. 42nd Annu. IEEE Sympos. Found. Comput. Sci., pages 66--73, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Indyk. Algorithmic applications of low-distortion geometric embeddings. In Proc. 42nd Annu. IEEE Sympos. Found. Comput. Sci., pages 10--31, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. P. Indyk and M. Thorup. Approximate 1-median. manuscript, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. W.B. Johnson and J. Lindenstrauss. Extensions of lipshitz mapping into hilbert space. Contemporary Mathematics, 26:189--206, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Magen. Dimensionality reductions that preserve volumes and distance to affine spaces, and its algorithmic applications. Manuscript, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. N. Mishra, D. Oblinger, and L. Pitt. Sublinear time approximate clustering. In SODA 12, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. N. Megiddo and A. Tamir. On the complexity of locating linear facilities in the plane. Oper. Res. Lett., 1:194--197, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Projective clustering in high dimensions using core-sets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SCG '02: Proceedings of the eighteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry
      June 2002
      330 pages
      ISBN:1581135041
      DOI:10.1145/513400

      Copyright © 2002 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 June 2002

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      SCG '02 Paper Acceptance Rate35of104submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader