skip to main content
10.1145/544862.544906acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An approach to the analysis and design of multiagent systems based on interaction frames

Published:15 July 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces InFFrA, a novel method for the analysis and design of multiagent systems that is based on the notions of interaction frames and framing. We lay out a conceptual framework for viewing multiagent systems (MAS) as societies consisting of socially intelligent agents that record and organise their interaction experience so as to use it strategically in future interactions. We also provide criteria for the class of MAS InFFrA is suited for. The benefits of our approach are that it helps to understand and develop socially intelligent agents as well as to identify shortcomings of existing MAS. The method is evaluated through the analysis of an opponent classification heuristic that is used to optimise strategic behaviour in multiagent games, and interesting issues for future research are discussed.

References

  1. W. Brauer, M. Nickles, M. Rovatsos, G. Weiß, and K. F. Lorentzen. Expectation-Oriented Analysis and Design. In Proc. AOSE'2001, volume 2222 of LNCS. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Carmel and S. Markovitch. Learning and using opponent models in adversary search. Technical Report 9609, Technion, 1996Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Carmel and S. Markovitch. Learning models of intelligent agents. In Proc. AAAI'1996, pages 62--67, Menlo Park, CA, 1996. AAAI Press/MIT Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole. Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. Goffman. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organisation of Experience. Harper and Row, New York, NY, 1974Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. L. Kolodner. Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1993 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa. Games and Decisions. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1957Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Rovatsos. Interaction frames for artificial agents. Technical Report Research Report FKI-244-01, Technical University of Munich, 2001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Rovatsos and M. Wolf. Towards Social Complexity Reduction in Multiagent Learning: the AdHoc Approach. Technical Report SS-02-02, AAAI Press, Stanford, CA, 2002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Watkins and P. Dayan. Q-learning. Machine Learning, 8:279--292, 1992 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An approach to the analysis and design of multiagent systems based on interaction frames

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        AAMAS '02: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 2
        July 2002
        508 pages
        ISBN:1581134800
        DOI:10.1145/544862

        Copyright © 2002 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 July 2002

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,155of5,036submissions,23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader