Robert St. Amant
ABSTRACT
The metaphor of tool use for describing the interaction between a human and a computer is pervasive in user interface design. The basic concept of tool use, however, is difficult to define precisely, for HCI purposes or in general. In this paper we argue that a close examination of physical tool use can improve the design of interactive software. We describe a drawing application, HabilisDraw, that incorporates some of the properties we associate with physical tools but are not commonly found in software: persistent tool objects that encapsulate behavior and information, that can be used in conjunction with one another, and that embody rich cues about their appropriate usage. Initial results from formative evaluation suggest that the approach has some promise.
- P. Agre and I. Horswill. Lifeworld analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 6:111-145, 1997. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- B. B. Beck. Animal Tool Behavior: The Use and Manufacture of Tools. Garland Press, New York, NY, 1980.Google Scholar
- B. B. Bederson, J. D. Hollan, A. Druin, J. Stewart, D. Rogers, and D. Proft. Local tools: an alternative to tool palettes. In Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 169-170. ACM Press, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Chapman. Intermediate vision: Architecture, implementation, and use. Cognitive Science, 16(4):491-537, 1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Cypher. Eager: Programming repetitive tasks by demonstration. In A. Cypher, editor, Watch What I Do: Programming by Demonstration. MIT Press, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Fischer. Turning breakdowns into opportunities for creativity. Knowledge-Based Systems, 7(4):221-232, 1994.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Gentner and J. Nielsen. The anti-mac interface. Communications of the ACM, 39(8):70-82, August 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Greenberg. The computer user as toolsmith : the use, reuse, and organization of computer-based tools. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Hutchins. Metaphors for interface design. In M. M. Taylor, F. Neel, and D. G. Bouwhuis, editors, The Structure of Multimodal Dialogue, pages 11-28. North-Holland, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1989.Google Scholar
- E. Hutchins. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.Google Scholar
- E. J. Ingmanson. Tool-using behavior in wild pan paniscus: Social and ecological considerations. In A. E. Russon, K. A. Bard, and S. T. Parker, editors, Reaching into Thought: The minds of the great apes, chapter 9, pages 190-210. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996.Google Scholar
- C. M. Keller and J. D. Keller. Cognition and tool use: The blacksmith at work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996.Google Scholar
- D. Kirsh. The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73(31-68), 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Lieberman, editor. Your Wish is My Command: Giving Users the Power to Instruct their Software. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. McCullough. Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. C. McGrew. The intelligent use of tools: Twenty propositions. In K. R. Gibson and T. Ingold, editors, Tools, language, and cognition in human evolution, pages 151-170. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993.Google Scholar
- D. A. Norman. Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll, editor, Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface, pages 17-38. Cambridge University Press, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Povinelli, editor. Folk Physics for Apes. Oxford University Press, NY, 2000.Google Scholar
- B. Preston. Cognition and tool use. Mind and Language, 13(4):513-547, December 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Raisamo. An alternative way of drawing. In Proceedings of CHI'99 (ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing), pages 175-182, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. O. Riedl and R. St. Amant. Toward automated exploration of interactive systems. In Proceedings of Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 135-142, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. R. Semin. Cognition, language, and communication. In S. R. Fussell and R. J. Kreuz, editors, Social and Cognitive Approaches to Interpersonal Communication, pages 229-258. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1998.Google Scholar
- A. W. Smitsman. The development of tool use: Changing boundaries between organism and environment. In C. Dent-Read and P. Zukow-Goldring, editors, Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism-environment systems. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 1997.Google Scholar
- R. St. Amant. User interface affordances in a planning representation. Human Computer Interaction, 14(3):317-354, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. St. Amant and T. E. Horton. A tool-based interactive drawing environment (extended abstract). In CHI '02 (ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing), Extended Abstracts, 2002. To appear. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Stewart, E. M. Raybourn, B. Bederson, and A. Druin. When two hands are better than one: Enhancing collaboration using single display groupware. In Proceedings of CHI '98 (ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing), Extended Abstracts, pages 287-288. ACM Press, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. C. Stone, K. Fishkin, and E. A. Bier. The movable filter as a user interface tool. In Proceedings of CHI'94 (ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing), pages 306-312. ACM Press, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. van Leeuwen, A. Smitsman, and C. van Leeuwen. Affordances, perceptual complexity, and the development of tool use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(1):174-191, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Vauclair. Animal Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.Google Scholar
- E. Visalberghi and L. Limongelli. Acting and understanding: Tool use revisited through the minds of capuchin monkeys. In A. E. Russon, K. A. Bard, and S. T. Parker, editors, Reaching into Thought: The minds of the great apes, chapter 3, pages 57-79. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Characterizing tool use in an interactive drawing environment
Recommendations
A tool-based interactive drawing environment
CHI EA '02: CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsGraphical user interfaces rely heavily on the tool metaphor. In most drawing systems, for example, functions are organized as they might be on a workbench; buttons associated with drawing modes for lines or rectangles are called line-drawing or ...
Comments