skip to main content
10.1145/57167.57184acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Transfer between menu systems

Published:01 May 1988Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates whether changes in the user/computer dialogue structure will affect the performance of users who are familiar with an earlier version of the product. Quantitative predictions using the Kieras and Polson (1985) production system model were derived to test whether changing the lexical attributes and structure of a popular menu-driven word-processor would permit transfer of existing knowledge of the word-processor to a new version. The results show that changes to the dialogue structure of the menu-system are not detrimental, while changes to the lexical attributes of the menus will hinder user performance.

References

  1. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P. Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Engelbeck, G. (11986). Exceptions to generalizations: Implications for general formal models of humancomputer interaction. Unpublished master's: Thesis. University of Colorado, Boulder.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. (1980) Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 1980, 12, 306-355.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Karat, J., Boyes, L., Weisgerber, S, & Schafer, C. (1986). Transfer between word processing systems. In M. Mantei & P. Orbeton (Eds.), Proceedings CHI'86 Human factors in computer systems (pp.#67-71). New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kieras, D.E. & Bovair, S. (1986). The acquisition of procedures from text: A production-system analysis of transfer of training. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 507-524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kieras, D.E., & Poison, P.G. (1985). An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, 365-394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. NewelI, A., Simon, H.A. (1972) Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Polson, P. G. (1987) A quantitative theory of humancomputer interaction. In j. M. Carroll (Ed.) Interfacing thought: Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Poison, P.G., & Kieras, D.E. (1985). A qu~mtitative model of the learning and performance of text editing knowledge. In L. Borman & B Curtis (Eds.) Proceedings of the CHI '85 Conference on Human Factors in Computing. (pp. #207-212). New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Poison, P.G., Muncher, E., & Engelbeck, G. (1986), A test of a common dements theory of transfer. In M. Mantei & P. Orbeton (Eds.), Proceedings CHI '86 Human factors in computer systems (pp,#78-83). New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Poison, P.G., Muncher, E., and Kieras, D.E. (1987) Transfer of" skills between inconsistent editors. Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation (MCC) Technical Report Number ACA- HI-395-87, Austin, Texas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Thomdike, E.L. & Woodward, R.S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Transfer between menu systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '88: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 1988
          292 pages
          ISBN:0201142376
          DOI:10.1145/57167

          Copyright © 1988 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 May 1988

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '88 Paper Acceptance Rate39of187submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader