skip to main content
10.1145/583890.583892acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

On relationships offering new drill-across possibilities

Published:08 November 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

OLAP tools divide concepts based on whether they are used as analysis dimensions, or are the fact subject of analysis, which gives rise to star shape schemas. Operations are always provided to navigate inside such star schemas. However, the navigation among different stars is usually overlooked. This paper studies different kinds of Object-Oriented conceptual relationships (part of UML standard) between stars (namely Derivation, Generalization, Association, and Flow) that allow to drill across them.

References

  1. A. Abelló, J. Samos, and F. Saltor. Understanding Facts in a Multidimensional Object-Oriented Model. In Proc. of the 4th Int. Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP(DOLAP), pages 32--39. ACM Press, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Abelló, J. Samos, and F. Saltor. YAM2 (Yet Another Multidimensional Model): An extension of UML. In Proc. of the Int. Database Engineering & Applications Symposium (IDEAS'02), pages 172--181. IEEE Press, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Cabibbo and R. Torlone. A logical approach to multidimensional databases. In Advances in Database Technology - EDBT'98}, number 1377 in LNCS, pages 183--197. Springer, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Eder and C. Koncilia. Changes of Dimension Data in Temporal Data Warehouses. In Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK), volume 2114 of LNCS. Springer, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W. Giovinazzo. O-O Data Warehouse Design. Prentice Hall, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Golfarelli, D. Maio, and S. Rizzi. The Dimensional Fact Model: a Conceptual Model for Data Warehouses. Int. Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 7(2&3):215--247, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. V. Gopalkrishnan, Q. Li, and K. Karlapalem. Star/snow-flake schema driven object-relational data warehouse design and query processing strategies. In Proc. of 1st Int. Workshop on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK), number 1676 in LNCS, pages 11--22. Springer, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. H. Inmon. Building the Data Warehouse. John Wiley & Sons, 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. ISO. ISO/IEC 9075:1999: Information technology --- Database languages --- SQL. Int. Organization for Standardization, 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Kimball. The Data Warehouse toolkit. John Wiley & Sons, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Kimball, L. Reeves, M. Ross, and W. Thornthwaite. The Data Warehouse lifecycle toolkit. John Willey & Sons, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W. Lehner. Modeling large scale OLAP scenarios. In Advances in Database Technology - EDBT'98, number 1377 in LNCS. Springer, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. L. Moody and M. A. R. Kortink. From enterprise models to dimensional models: A methodology for data warehouse and data mart design. In Proc. of 2nd Int. Workshop on Design and Management of Data Warehouses (DMDW). Swiss Life, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. OMG. Unified Modeling Language Specification, September 2001. Version 1.4.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. T. B. Pedersen. Aspects of Data Modeling and Query Processing for Complex Multidimensional Data. PhD thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Aalborg University (Denmark), 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. B. Pedersen and C. S. Jensen. Multidimensional data modeling for complex data. In Proc. of 15th Int. Conf. on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 336--345. IEEE Computer Society, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. Sapia, M. Blaschka, G. Höfling, and B. Dinter. Extending the E/R model for the multidimensional paradigm. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Data Warehouse and Data Mining (DWDM) in conjunction with the ER'98, number 1552 in LNCS, pages 105--116. Springer, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Shoshani and M. Rafanelli. A Model for Representing Statistical Objects. In Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Information Systems and Management of Data (COMAD). McGraw-Hill, 1991.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. C. Trujillo, M. Palomar, J. Gmez, and I.-Y. Song. Designing Data Warehouses with OO Conceptual Models. IEEE Computer, 34(12):66--75, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. N. Tryfona, F. Busborg, and J. G. B. Christiansen. starER: A conceptual model for data warehouse design. In Proc. of ACM 2nd Int. Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP (DOLAP), 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On relationships offering new drill-across possibilities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DOLAP '02: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP
      November 2002
      88 pages
      ISBN:1581135904
      DOI:10.1145/583890

      Copyright © 2002 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 November 2002

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate29of79submissions,37%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader