skip to main content
10.1145/584955.584963acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Design of documentation for handheld ergonomics: presenting clinical evidence at the point of care

Published:20 October 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Medical doctors require high quality clinical evidence at the point of care in order to support their decision-making. Presentation of clinical evidence on handheld devices, and in a timely fashion, requires an integrated approach to documentation and ergonomic design. This paper reports on results from The Bringing Evidence to the Point of Care Project at the University of Toronto, concerning the display of quantitative data as part of clinical evidence. After introducing the problem and some of the relevant background literature, we indicate some prototype designs for presenting quantitative information on a handheld device, as graphs or tables. We then report on an initial usability study that compares the different prototypes. The results indicate that the doctors preferred statistical information to be presented as tables on the handheld device used in this study (in preference to lists or graphs).

References

  1. Lohse, Gerald, Models of Graphical Perception, Handbook for Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Edition, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lusk, E.J. and Kersnick. M. The effect of cognitive style and report format on task performance: The MIS design consequences, Management Science 28. 8 (Aug. 1979), 787--798.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Remus, W.E. "An experimental investigation of the impact of graphical and tabular data presentations in decision making" Management Science, 30, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Sackett, D.L., Straus, S.E. "Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the "evidence cart"", JAMA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sackett, David L. et al., Evidence-Based Medicine - How to Practice and teach EBM 2nd Ed., Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Schutz, H.G. An evaluation of formats for graphical trend displays-Experiment II. Human Factors, 3, 2 (Feb. 1961), 99--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Straus, S.E., I-Hong Hsu, Stephen (Ed), Ball, Christopher M., Phillips, Robert. Evidence-Based Acute Medicine. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Straus, S.E., Sackett, D.L., "Bringing evidence to the point of care", JAMA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Takeshita, Harumi, Davis, Dianne, Straus, S.E., "Clinical Evidence at the Point of Care in Acute Medicine", University of Toronto, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Umanatha, N.S., & Scamell, R.W. "An experimental investigation of the impact of data display format on recall performance", Communication of the ACM, 31, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Washburne. J.N. An experimental study of various graphic, tabular and (textural) methods of presenting quantitative material. Journal of Educational Psychology IS. 6 (1927), 361--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Design of documentation for handheld ergonomics: presenting clinical evidence at the point of care

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGDOC '02: Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Computer documentation
        October 2002
        272 pages
        ISBN:1581135432
        DOI:10.1145/584955

        Copyright © 2002 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 October 2002

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader