skip to main content
10.1145/62083.62094acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplashConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Building a backtracking facility in smalltalk without kernel support

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 January 1988Publication History

ABSTRACT

Languages like Snobol, Prolog, and Icon were designed with backtracking facilities from the outset and these facilities are deeply intertwined with the implementation. Retrofitting a backtracking facility in a language that wasn't designed for it has never been achieved. We report on an experiment to retrofit Smalltalk with a backtracking facility. The facility is provided through a small number of primitives written in the language (no modifications to the kernel were made). The ability to do this is a direct result of the power provided by the objectification of contexts.

References

  1. 1.Clocksin, W.F. and MeUish, C.S. Progranuning in Prolog. Springer-Verlag. 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Goldberg, A. and Robson, D. Smalltalk-80: The language and its implementation. Addison-Wesley. 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Griswold, R.E. and Griswold, M.T. The Icon programming language. Prentice-Hall. 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Griswold, R.E., Poag~, J.F., and Polonsky, I.P. The Snobol4 programming language. Prentice-Hall. 1971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.LaLonde, W.R. A novel rule-based facility for SmaUtalk. ECOOP '87, Paris, Franc, e, June, 1987, pp. 193-198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Maes, P. Concepts and Experiments in Computational Reflection. Proceedings of OOPSLA '87, Orlando. Florida, October 1987, pp. 147-155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Smith, B. Reflections and semantics in a procedural language. M.I.T. Laboratory for Computer Science Report MIT-TR-272, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Building a backtracking facility in smalltalk without kernel support

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          OOPSLA '88: Conference proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages and applications
          January 1988
          390 pages
          ISBN:0897912845
          DOI:10.1145/62083

          Copyright © 1988 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 January 1988

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate268of1,244submissions,22%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader