Abstract
Ever since knowledge acquisition systems have been applied to real world problems, the issue of integration has become important (Gaines 88). Most often, the following types of integration are considered:• Systems are to be integrated: the knowledge acquisition system is more closely linked with an expert system shell (Eshelman et al. 87), or a database system is linked to the knowledge acquisition system in order to read data of a domain.• Various sources of knowledge are to be integrated: text files, data files, statistics, rules and facts all contain knowledge about a domain and should be handled by the same system (Gaines 88).• The represented knowledge of various experts is to be integrated either into one consistent domain model or into a model which shows the conflicting views of the domain (Shaw 88).• Diverse knowledge sources with their respective representations are to be integrated, e.g. a taxonomy of domain concepts, possible values of attributes, well-formedness conditions of facts and rules.• Diverse tasks of knowledge acquisition are to be integrated: declaring epistemic primitives, defining concepts, adding facts and rules, deducing new facts from rules, dealing with inconsistencies, changing the terminology, changing facts and rules, grouping facts or rules together, presenting possible operations, showing views of the represented domain model, indicating consequences of an operation to the user. A particular topic of task integration is the integration of machine learning into a knowledge acquisition system.In this paper, we want to discuss only the last two integration problems and present the solutions we implemented in the BLIP system, currently under development at the Technical University of Berlin1. First, we give a short overview of knowledge acquisition tasks and indicate which tasks some prototype systems can handle. As we will see, the integration of machine learning into knowledge acquisition is still not yet well achieved. Second, we discuss the integration of tasks. In particular, the integration of machine learning into knowledge acquisition is discussed in some detail. The architecture of BLIP illustrates the paradigm of cooperative balanced modeling of both system and user. Third, we investigate the integration of knowledge sources. The integrity between diverse knowledge sources, the propagation of consequences of the operation to all relevant knowledge sources, and the interpretability of a component's results by other components are the 3 issues there. In BLIP, the knowledge needed for the learning task is also integrated into the domain knowledge. This gives BLIP the power of closed-loop learning (Michalski 87). Fourth, we describe the integration of BLIP's learning into knowledge revision in more detail.
- Abrett, G.; Burstein, M. H. (86): "The KREME Knowledge Editing Environment"; In: Procs. 1nd Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Banff, 1986.Google Scholar
- Bennett, J.S.(83): "ROGET: A Knowledge-Based Consultant for Acquiring the Conceptual Structure of an Expert System"; Stanford Heuristic Programming Project, 1983.Google Scholar
- Boose, J.H., Bradshaw, J.M. (87): "Expertise Transfer and Complex Problems Using AQUINAS as a Knowledge Acquisition Workbench for Expert Systems"; In: International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davis, R.(82): "Teiresias: Applications of Meta-Level Knowledge"; In: Davis, R.; Lenat, D.B.: "Knowledge-Based Systems in Artifical Intelligence"; McGraw-Hill, 1982. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Diederich, J.; Ruhmann, I.; May, M. (87): "KRITON: A Knowledge Acquisition Tool for Expert Systems"; International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emde, W. (88): "An Inference Engine for Representing Multiple Theories"; In: Morik, K. (ed.): "Knowledge Representation and Organization in Machine Learning", Springer, to appear 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eshelman, L., Ehret, D., McDermott, J., Tan, M. (87): "MOLE: A Tenacious Knowledge Acquisition Tool"; In: International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaines, B. (88): "Second Generation Knowledge Acquisition Systems"; In: Boose, J.; Gaines, B.; Linster, M. (eds.): Procs. 2nd European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, GMD-Studien Nr. 143, 1988.Google Scholar
- Habel, Ch.; Rollinger, C.R. (82): "The Machine as Concept Learner"; In: Proc. of the ECAI-82, Orsay, Frankreich, 1982.Google Scholar
- Hayes-Roth, F.; Waterman, D.A.; Lenat, D. (83): "Building Expert Systems"; Addison-Wesley, 1983. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kahn, G.S.; Breaux, E.H.; Joseph, R.L.; DeKlerk, P. (86): "An Intelligent Mixed-Initiative Workbench for Knowledge Acquisition"; In: Procs. 1nd Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Banff, 1986.Google Scholar
- Kietz, J.-U.(88): "Incremental and Reversible Acquisition of Taxonomies" In: Boose, J.; Gaines, B.; Linster, M. (eds.): Procs. 2nd European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, GMD-Studien Nr. 143, 1988.Google Scholar
- Kodratoff, Y.; Tecuci, G. (88): "The Central Role of Explanation in DISCIPLE";In: Morik, K. (ed.): "Knowledge Representation and Organization in Machine Learning", Springer, to appear 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ludwig, A.;Mellis, W.; Thomas, L. (87): "IKEE - An Integrated Knowledge Engineering Environment for Rule-base Development" In: Procs. 7th Int. Workshop on Expert Systems and their Applications, Avignon, 1987.Google Scholar
- Manago, M.; Blythe, J. (88): "Learning Disjunctive Concepts"; In: Morik, K. (ed.): "Knowledge Representation and Organization in Machine Leaning", Springer, to appear 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McDermott, J. (86): talk given at the "Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems" Workshop, Banff, 1987.Google Scholar
- Michalski, R.S. (87): talk given at the "Knowledge Representation and Organization in Machine Learning" Workshop, Geseke, 1987.Google Scholar
- Michalski, R.S. (83): "A Theory and Methodology of Inductive Learning"; In: R.S.Michalski/J.G.Carbonell/T.M.Mitchell (eds.): Machine Learning; Tioga, Palo Alto, 1983.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, T.M.; Mahadevan, S.; Steinberg, L.I. (85): "LEAP: A Learning Apprentice for VLSI Design"; In: Proc. IJCAI-85, Los Angeles, CA, 1985.Google Scholar
- Morik, K. (87): "Acquiring Domain Models"; In: International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morik, K. (88): "Sloppy Modeling", In: Morik, K. (ed.): "Knowledge Representation and Organization in Machine Learning", Springer, to appear 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Musen, M.A.; Fagan, L.M.; Combs, D.M.; Shortliffe, E.H. (87): "Use of a domain model to drive an interactive knowledge-editing tool"; In: International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Perlis, D. (85): "Languages with Self-Reference I: Foundations (or: We Can Have Everything in First-Order Logic!)"; Artificial Intelligence 25, North-Holland, pp. 301-322, 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Quinlan, R.J. (83): "Learning Efficient Classification Procedures and their Application to Chess End Games"; In: Michalski/Mitchell/Carbonell (eds.): Machine Learning; Tioga Press, Palo Alto, 1983.Google Scholar
- Shaw, M. L. G. (88): "Problems of Validation in a Knowledge Acquisition System using Multiple Experts"; In: Boose, J.; Gaines, B.; Linster, M. (eds.): Procs. 2nd European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, GMD-Studien Nr. 143, 1988.Google Scholar
- Stepp, R. E.; Whitehall, B. L.; Holder, L. B. (88): "Towards Intelligent Machine Learning Algorithms"; In: Procs. 8th ECAI, 1988.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thieme, S. (88): "The Aquisition of Model Knowledge for a Model-Driven Machine Learning Approach"; In: K. Morik (ed.): "Knowledge Representation and Organization in Machine Learning", Springer, to appear 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wrobel, S. (87a): "Design Goals for Sloppy Modeling Systems"; In: Procs. 2nd Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Banff, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wrobel, S. (87b): "Higher-order Concepts in a Tractable Knowledge Representation"; In: Procs. 11th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence, Springer, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wrobel, S. (88): "Demand-Driven Concept Formation"; In: K. Morik (ed.): "Knowledge Representation and Organization in Machine Learning", Springer, to appear 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Integration issue in knowledge acquisition systems
Recommendations
The Impact of Knowledge Acquisition and Knowledge Integration of IT Outsourcing Supplier on Outsourcing Success -- Knowledge Sticky's Moderating Effect
ICSS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Service ScienceIn this study we analyze the emerging patterns of knowledge management of IT outsourcing supplier, which divided it into knowledge acquisition and knowledge integration, Since outsourcing success is related to a large amount of knowledge, it is of great ...
Comments