skip to main content
10.1145/642611.642681acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Faceted metadata for image search and browsing

Published:05 April 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

There are currently two dominant interface types for searching and browsing large image collections: keyword-based search, and searching by overall similarity to sample images. We present an alternative based on enabling users to navigate along conceptual dimensions that describe the images. The interface makes use of hierarchical faceted metadata and dynamically generated query previews. A usability study, in which 32 art history students explored a collection of 35,000 fine arts images, compares this approach to a standard image search interface. Despite the unfamiliarity and power of the interface (attributes that often lead to rejection of new search interfaces), the study results show that 90% of the participants preferred the metadata approach overall, 97% said that it helped them learn more about the collection, 75% found it more flexible, and 72% found it easier to use than a standard baseline system. These results indicate that a category-based approach is a successful way to provide access to image collections.

References

  1. L. H. Armitage and P. G. B. Enser. Analysis of user need in image archives. Journal of Information Science, 23(4):287--299, 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. L. Bernard. Examining the effects of hypertext shape on user performance. Usability News, 4(2), 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Borland and P. Ingwersen. The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, 53(3):225--250, 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. C. Carson, M. Thomas, S. Belongie, J. M. Hellerstein, and J. Malik. Blobworld: {A system for region-based image indexing and retrieval. In Third International Conference on Visual Information Systems, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. M. Elliott. Computational Support for Sketching and Image Sorting During the Early Phase of Architectural Design. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Fellbaum, editor. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. R. Garber and M. B. Grunes. The art of search: A study of art directors. In Proc. of CHI-92, Monterey, CA, 1992.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Hearst, J. English, R. Sinha, K. Swearingen, and K.-P. Yee. Finding the flow in web site search. Communications of the ACM, 45(9), September 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. M. Jose, J. Furner, and D. J. Harper. Spatial querying for image retrieval: a user-oriented evaluation. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR '98, pages 232--240, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Markkula and E. Sormunen. End-user searching challenges indexing practices in the digital newspaper photo archive. Information Retrieval, 1:259--285, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Muramatsu and W. Pratt. Transparent queries: Investigating users' mental models of search engines. In Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 217--224, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W. Niblack, R. Barber, W. Equitz, M. Flickner, E. Glasman, D. Petkovic, P. Yanker, and C. Faloutsos. The QBIC project: Querying images by content using color, texture, and shape. SPIE: Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases, 1908, 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Ortega, Y. Rui, K. Chakrabarti, S. Mehrotra, and T. S. Huang. Supporting similarity queries in MARS. In ACM Multimedia, pages 403--413, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. Plaisant, B. Shneiderman, K. Doan, and T. Bruns. Interface and data architecture for query preview in networked information systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 17(3):320--341, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Rodden, W. Basalaj, D. Sinclair, and K. R. Wood. Does organisation by similarity assist image browsing? In Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI 2001, pages 190--197, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. Shneiderman, D. Byrd, and W. B. Croft. Sorting out searching: A user-interface framework for text searches. Communications of the ACM, 41(4):95--98, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. K. Srihari, Z. Zhang, and A. Rao. Intelligent indexing and semantic retrieval of multimodal documents. Information Retrieval, 2(2/3):245--275, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. R. C. Veltkamp and M. Tanase. Content-Based Image Retrieval Systems: A Survey. Technical Report UU-CS-2000-34, Dept. of Computing Science, Utrecht University, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Faceted metadata for image search and browsing

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CHI '03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              April 2003
              620 pages
              ISBN:1581136307
              DOI:10.1145/642611

              Copyright © 2003 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 5 April 2003

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              CHI '03 Paper Acceptance Rate75of468submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

              Upcoming Conference

              CHI '24
              CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              May 11 - 16, 2024
              Honolulu , HI , USA

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader