skip to main content
article
Free Access

Walking on an electric treadmill while performing VDT office work

Published:01 August 1989Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The physiological and psychological health problems associated with sedentary office work are well documented, but their solution has proved elusive. In this study a specially designed office permitted the comparison of conventional word processing (sedentary condition) to word processing performed while walking on an electric treadmill at 1.4 to 2.8 km/hr (active condition). Five subjects after several days of practice produced two test trials each consisting of six 20-minute intervals of word processing. For the sedentary condition the subjects were seated, during all six intervals. For the active condition, treadmill-walking and seated intervals were alternated. Variables measured included word processing performance score, stress and arousal indices, and body complaint count. The first of these was tested with a repeated ANOVA and Newman-Keuls post hoc, and the latter three with correlated t-tests. No significant differences were found between the two conditions for performance or body complaints. Stress was significantly lower (p < .05), and arousal was higher but not quite significant (P < .07) for the active condition. We conclude that treadmill walking and routine word processing can be performed concurrently without a decrement in work performance, and that certain physiological and psychological benefits may result.

References

  1. Andersson, Gunnar B. J., Schultz, Albert B., Ortengren, Roland, 1986. Truck muscle forces during desk work. Ergonomics, 29(9) 1113--1127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Arndt, Robert, 1983. Working posture and musculoskeletal problems of video display terminal operators -- review and reappraisal. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 44(6), 437--446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bezold, Clement, Carlson, Rick J., Peck, Jonathan C., 1986. The future of work and health, (Dover, Massachusetts, London: Auburn House Publishing Company).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantoni, S., Colombini, D., Occhipinto, E., Grieco, A., Frigo, C. and Pedotti, A., 1984. Posture analysis and evaluation at the old and new workplace in a telephone company. In Ergonomics and Health in Modern Offices (Edited by E. Grandjean) (London, Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Ltd), 461--463.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Corlett, E. N., Bishop, R., 1976. A Technique for Assessing Postural Discomfort. Ergonomics, 19(2) 175--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Corlett, E. N., 1983. Analysis and evaluation of working posture. In Ergonomics of workstation design, (Edited by Tarald O. Kvalseth) (London: Butterworth & Co. Ltd).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox, Tom, 1978. Stress (Baltimore, University Park Press) p. 76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox, Tom, 1985. The nature and measurement of stress. Ergonomics, 28(8) 1155--1163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cox, Tom, Mackay, Colin, 1985a. The measurement of self-reported stress and arousal. British Journal of Psychology 76, 183--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Grandjean, E., 1984. Postural problems at office machine work stations. In Ergonomics and Health in Modern Offices (Ed. E. Grandjean) (London, Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Ltd), 148--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Grieco, A., 1986. Sitting posture: an old problem and a new one. Ergonomics, 29(3) 345--362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Haskell, William L., Montoyhe, Henry J., Orienstein, Diane, 1985. Physical activity and exercise to achieve health-related physical fitness components, Public Health Reports, 100(2) 202--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hunting, Wilhelm, 1984. Postural Loads at VDT work-stations. In Health Hazards of VDTs?, (Ed. B. G. Pearce) (New York: John Wiley & Sons) p. 135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kroemer, Karl H. E., 1988. Ergonomic seats for computer workstations. In Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors V, (Ed. F. Aghazadeh) (North-Holland, Ill.: Elsevier Science Publishers) p. 313--320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MacKay, Colin, Cox, Tom, Burrows, Grenville, Lazzerini, Toni, 1978. An inventory for the measurement of self-reported stress and arousal. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 17, 283--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. McArdle, William D., Katch, Frank I., Katch, Victor L., 1986. Exercise Physiology (Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger) 642--649.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mason, James O. and Powell, Kenneth E., 1985. Physical activity, behavioral epidemiology, and public health. Public Health Reports, 100(2) 113--115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ogden, George D., Levine, Jerrold M., Eisner, Ellen J., 1979. Measurement of workload by secondary tasks. Human Factors 21(5) 529--548.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Pustinger, Carole, Dainoff, Marvin J., Smith, Michael, 1985. VDT workstation adjustability: effects on worker posture, productivity, and health complaints. In Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II (Ed. R. E. Eberts and C. G. Eberts) (North-Lolland MN: Elsevier Science Publishers).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Reilly, Thomas and Smith, Donna, 1986. Effect of work intensity on performance in a psychomotor task during exercise. Ergonomics, 29(4) 601--606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Rosch, Paul J., 1985. Exercise and stress reduction. Comprehensive Therapy, 11(4) 10--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sauter, Steven L., Gottieb, Mark S., Rohrer, Kathryn M., Dodson, Vernon N., 1983. The Well Being of Video Display Terminal Users: An Exploratory Study (Madison, Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin, Department of Preventive Medicine 79--80, 85--6, 135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sauter, Steven L., Knutson, S. J., 1984. Ergonomic Evaluation of VDT Workplaces. (Cincinnati, Ohio) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Center for Disease Control, United States Public Health Service.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sauter, Steven L., Chapman, John L., and Knutson, Sheri J., 1984(a). Improving VDT Work: Causes and Control of Health Concerns in VDT Use. (Madison, Wisconsin, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin) (Preliminary Edition) 71--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Scharit, Joseph and Salvendy, Gavriel, 1982. Occupational Stress: Review and Reappraisal. Human Factors, 24(2), 129--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Shute, Steven J. and Starr, Steven J., 1984. Effects of adjustable furniture on VDT Users. Human Factors 26(2) 157--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Smith, Michael J., Cohen, Barbara G., Stammerjohn, Lamber W., 1981. An investigation of health complaints and job stress in video display operations. Human Factors, 23(4) 387--400Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Smith, Richard P., 1981. Boredom: A Review. Human Factors, 23(3), 329- 340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Wiener, Earl L., 1984. Vigilance and task load: in search of the inverted U. Human Factors, 26(2), 215--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Winkel, Jogen and Jorgensen, Kurt, 1986. Evaluation of foot swelling and lower-limb temperatures in relation to leg activity during long- term seated office work. Ergonomics, 29(2) 313--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Walking on an electric treadmill while performing VDT office work

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGCHI Bulletin
      ACM SIGCHI Bulletin  Volume 21, Issue 1
      July 1989
      134 pages
      ISSN:0736-6906
      DOI:10.1145/67880
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 1989 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 August 1989

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader