Abstract
The physiological and psychological health problems associated with sedentary office work are well documented, but their solution has proved elusive. In this study a specially designed office permitted the comparison of conventional word processing (sedentary condition) to word processing performed while walking on an electric treadmill at 1.4 to 2.8 km/hr (active condition). Five subjects after several days of practice produced two test trials each consisting of six 20-minute intervals of word processing. For the sedentary condition the subjects were seated, during all six intervals. For the active condition, treadmill-walking and seated intervals were alternated. Variables measured included word processing performance score, stress and arousal indices, and body complaint count. The first of these was tested with a repeated ANOVA and Newman-Keuls post hoc, and the latter three with correlated t-tests. No significant differences were found between the two conditions for performance or body complaints. Stress was significantly lower (p < .05), and arousal was higher but not quite significant (P < .07) for the active condition. We conclude that treadmill walking and routine word processing can be performed concurrently without a decrement in work performance, and that certain physiological and psychological benefits may result.
- Andersson, Gunnar B. J., Schultz, Albert B., Ortengren, Roland, 1986. Truck muscle forces during desk work. Ergonomics, 29(9) 1113--1127.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arndt, Robert, 1983. Working posture and musculoskeletal problems of video display terminal operators -- review and reappraisal. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 44(6), 437--446.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bezold, Clement, Carlson, Rick J., Peck, Jonathan C., 1986. The future of work and health, (Dover, Massachusetts, London: Auburn House Publishing Company).Google Scholar
- Cantoni, S., Colombini, D., Occhipinto, E., Grieco, A., Frigo, C. and Pedotti, A., 1984. Posture analysis and evaluation at the old and new workplace in a telephone company. In Ergonomics and Health in Modern Offices (Edited by E. Grandjean) (London, Philadelphia: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd), 461--463.Google Scholar
- Corlett, E. N., Bishop, R., 1976. A Technique for Assessing Postural Discomfort. Ergonomics, 19(2) 175--182.Google Scholar
- Corlett, E. N., 1983. Analysis and evaluation of working posture. In Ergonomics of workstation design, (Edited by Tarald O. Kvalseth) (London: Butterworth &amp; Co. Ltd).Google Scholar
- Cox, Tom, 1978. Stress (Baltimore, University Park Press) p. 76.Google Scholar
- Cox, Tom, 1985. The nature and measurement of stress. Ergonomics, 28(8) 1155--1163.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cox, Tom, Mackay, Colin, 1985a. The measurement of self-reported stress and arousal. British Journal of Psychology 76, 183--186.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grandjean, E., 1984. Postural problems at office machine work stations. In Ergonomics and Health in Modern Offices (Ed. E. Grandjean) (London, Philadelphia: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd), 148--164.Google Scholar
- Grieco, A., 1986. Sitting posture: an old problem and a new one. Ergonomics, 29(3) 345--362.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haskell, William L., Montoyhe, Henry J., Orienstein, Diane, 1985. Physical activity and exercise to achieve health-related physical fitness components, Public Health Reports, 100(2) 202--211.Google Scholar
- Hunting, Wilhelm, 1984. Postural Loads at VDT work-stations. In Health Hazards of VDTs?, (Ed. B. G. Pearce) (New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons) p. 135.Google Scholar
- Kroemer, Karl H. E., 1988. Ergonomic seats for computer workstations. In Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors V, (Ed. F. Aghazadeh) (North-Holland, Ill.: Elsevier Science Publishers) p. 313--320.Google Scholar
- MacKay, Colin, Cox, Tom, Burrows, Grenville, Lazzerini, Toni, 1978. An inventory for the measurement of self-reported stress and arousal. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 17, 283--284.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McArdle, William D., Katch, Frank I., Katch, Victor L., 1986. Exercise Physiology (Philadelphia: Lea &amp; Febiger) 642--649.Google Scholar
- Mason, James O. and Powell, Kenneth E., 1985. Physical activity, behavioral epidemiology, and public health. Public Health Reports, 100(2) 113--115.Google Scholar
- Ogden, George D., Levine, Jerrold M., Eisner, Ellen J., 1979. Measurement of workload by secondary tasks. Human Factors 21(5) 529--548.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pustinger, Carole, Dainoff, Marvin J., Smith, Michael, 1985. VDT workstation adjustability: effects on worker posture, productivity, and health complaints. In Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II (Ed. R. E. Eberts and C. G. Eberts) (North-Lolland MN: Elsevier Science Publishers).Google Scholar
- Reilly, Thomas and Smith, Donna, 1986. Effect of work intensity on performance in a psychomotor task during exercise. Ergonomics, 29(4) 601--606.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rosch, Paul J., 1985. Exercise and stress reduction. Comprehensive Therapy, 11(4) 10--15.Google Scholar
- Sauter, Steven L., Gottieb, Mark S., Rohrer, Kathryn M., Dodson, Vernon N., 1983. The Well Being of Video Display Terminal Users: An Exploratory Study (Madison, Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin, Department of Preventive Medicine 79--80, 85--6, 135.Google Scholar
- Sauter, Steven L., Knutson, S. J., 1984. Ergonomic Evaluation of VDT Workplaces. (Cincinnati, Ohio) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Center for Disease Control, United States Public Health Service.Google Scholar
- Sauter, Steven L., Chapman, John L., and Knutson, Sheri J., 1984(a). Improving VDT Work: Causes and Control of Health Concerns in VDT Use. (Madison, Wisconsin, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin) (Preliminary Edition) 71--75. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scharit, Joseph and Salvendy, Gavriel, 1982. Occupational Stress: Review and Reappraisal. Human Factors, 24(2), 129--162.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shute, Steven J. and Starr, Steven J., 1984. Effects of adjustable furniture on VDT Users. Human Factors 26(2) 157--170.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smith, Michael J., Cohen, Barbara G., Stammerjohn, Lamber W., 1981. An investigation of health complaints and job stress in video display operations. Human Factors, 23(4) 387--400Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smith, Richard P., 1981. Boredom: A Review. Human Factors, 23(3), 329- 340.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wiener, Earl L., 1984. Vigilance and task load: in search of the inverted U. Human Factors, 26(2), 215--222.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Winkel, Jogen and Jorgensen, Kurt, 1986. Evaluation of foot swelling and lower-limb temperatures in relation to leg activity during long- term seated office work. Ergonomics, 29(2) 313--328.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Walking on an electric treadmill while performing VDT office work
Recommendations
The Research of Differences in Hip Angle between Treadmill Walking and Ground Walking
ISCID '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Seventh International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design - Volume 01Analyzing the hip rotation angle data of several healthy young men with walking on ground and treadmill, it is found that the hip rotation angle curves of treadmill walking and level walking exist no significant differences in shape, while the amplitude,...
Construction of gait adaptation model in human splitbelt treadmill walking
There are a huge number of studies that measure kinematics, dynamics, the oxygen uptake and so on in human walking on the treadmill. Especially in walking on the splitbelt treadmill where the speed of the right and left belt is different, remarkable ...
The metabolic cost of passive walking during robotics-assisted treadmill exercise
Background: We are investigating the potential of robotics-assisted treadmill technology as a mode of exercise in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). People with incomplete SCI can actively contribute to this form of exercise, but in the clinical ...
Comments