skip to main content
10.1145/775832.775841acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Performance-impact limited area fill synthesis

Published:02 June 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Chemical-mechanical planarization (CMP) and other manufacturing steps in very deep-submicron VLSI have varying effects on device and interconnect features, depending on the local layout density. To improve manufacturability and performance predictability, area fill features are inserted into the layout to improve uniformity with respect to density criteria. However, the performance impact of area fill insertion is not considered by any fill method in the literature. In this paper, we first review and develop estimates for capacitance and timing overhead of area fill insertions. We then give the first formulations of the Performance Impact Limited Fill (PIL-Fill) problem with the objective of either minimizing total delay impact (MDFC) or maximizing the minimum slack of all nets (MSFC), subject to inserting a given prescribed amount of fill. For the MDFC PIL-Fill problem, we describe three practical solution approaches based on Integer Linear Programming (ILP-I and ILP-II) and the Greedy method. For the MSFC PIL-Fill problem, we describe an iterated greedy method that integrates call to an industry static timing analysis tool. We test our methods on layout testcases obtained from industry. Compared with the normal fill method [3], our ILP-II method for MDFC PIL-Fill problem achieves between 25-% and 90% reduction in terms of total weighted edge delay (roughly, a measure of sum of node slacks) impact while maintaining identical quality of the layout density control; and our iterated greedy method for MSFC PIL-Fill problem also shows significant advantage with respect to the minimum slack of nets on post-fill layout.

References

  1. N. D. Arora, K. V. Raol, R. Schumann, and L. M. Richardson, "Modeling and Extraction of Interconnect Capacitances for Multi-layer VLSI Circuits," IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design 15(1) (1996), pp. 58--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. E. Barke, "Line-to-Ground Capacitance Calculation for VLSI: A Comparison", IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design 7(2) (1988), pp. 295--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y. Chen, A. B. Kahng, G. Robins and A. Zelikovsky, "Dummy Fill Synthesis for Uniform Layout Density", IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 21(10) (2002), pp. 1132--1147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Chen, A. B. Kahng, G. Robins and A. Zelikovsky, "Smoothness and Uniformity of Filled Layout for VDSM Manufacturability," Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, April 2002, pp. 137--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Chern, J. Huang, L. Aldredge, P. Li and P. Yang, "Multilevel Metal Capacitance Models for Interconnect Capacitances", IEEE Electron Device Lett EDL-14 (1992), pp. 32--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Cong, L. He, A. B. Kahng, D. Noice, N. Shirali and S. H.-C. Yen, "Analysis and Justification of a Simple, Practical 2 1/2-D Capacitance Extraction Methodology", Proc. ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conf., 1997, pp. 627--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. W. C. Elmore, "The Transient Response of Damped Linear Networks with Particular Regard to Wideband Amplifiers", Journal of Applied Physics (1948), pp. 55--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. W. Grobman, M. Thompson, R. Wang, C. Yuan, R. Tian, and E. Demircan, "Reticle Enhancement Technology: Implications and Challenges for Physical Design ", Proc. ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conf., 2001, pp. 73--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. B. Kahng, S. Muddu and E. Sarto, "On Switch Factor Based Analysis of Coupled RC Interconnects", Proc. ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conf., 2000, pp. 79--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Praesagus, Inc., http://www.praesagus.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. E. Stine, D. S. Boning et al., "The Physical and Electrical Effects of Metal Fill Patterning Practices for Oxide Chemical Mechanical Polishing Processes", IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices 45(3) (1998), pp. 665--679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Toulouse, D. Bernard, C. Landrault and P. Nouet "Efficient 3D Modeling for Extraction of Interconnect Capacitances in Deep Submicron Dense Layouts", Proc. Design Automation and Test Europe, 1999, pp. 576--580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. UbiTech. Inc., http://www.ubitechnology.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. XYALIS, http://www.xyalis.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Performance-impact limited area fill synthesis

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            DAC '03: Proceedings of the 40th annual Design Automation Conference
            June 2003
            1014 pages
            ISBN:1581136889
            DOI:10.1145/775832

            Copyright © 2003 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 June 2003

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            DAC '03 Paper Acceptance Rate152of628submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

            Upcoming Conference

            DAC '24
            61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
            June 23 - 27, 2024
            San Francisco , CA , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader