skip to main content
10.1145/776322.776331acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

User-perceived quality-aware adaptive delivery of MPEG-4 content

Published:01 June 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many adaptive delivery mechanisms have been devised for streaming multimedia over best-effort IP networks. Most of these adaptive schemes do not consider the user's perception of quality when making adaptations. We propose that an optimum adaptation trajectory exists which indicates how encoding quality should be adapted (upgraded/downgraded) with respect to user perceived quality in response to network conditions. This optimum adaptation trajectory can be used with any transmission adaptation policy. We describe a system architecture that uses knowledge of user perceived quality to make adaptation decisions and give an example of how this knowledge can be used to complement the sender-based adaptation algorithm, LDA.

References

  1. Olivier Verscheure, Pascal Frossard and Maher Hamdi , "MPEG-2 Video Services over Packet Networks: Joint Effect of Encoding Rate and Data Loss on User-Oriented QoS", NOSSDAV 98, pp. 257--264, Cambridge, July 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Schulzrinne, A., Casner, S., "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet Draft, RFC 1889.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dorgham Sisalem, Henning Schulzrinne "The Loss-Delay based adjustment algorithm: a TCP-friendly adaptation scheme" Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dorgham Sisalem, Adam Wolisz "LDA+: A TCP-friendly adaptation scheme for multimedia communication", IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (III) 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dorgham Sisalem, Adam Wolisz, "MLDA: A TCP-friendly congestion control framework for heterogeneous multicast environments," in Eigth International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS 2000), Pittsburgh, PA, June 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. V. Jacobson S. McCanne, M. Vetterli. "Receiver-driven layered multicast." In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM'96, pages 117--130, Stanford, CA, August 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Christian J. van den Branden Lambrecht and Olivier Verscheure , "Perceptual Quality Measure using a Spatio-Temporal Model of the Human Visual System", Proceedings of SPIE 96, San Jose, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ITU-T J.143 "User requirements for objective perceptual video quality measurements in digital cable television".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ITU-T J.144, "Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for digital cable television in the presence of a full reference".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. ITU-T P.910, "Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. N. Cranley, P. Perry, L. Murphy, "Optimum Adaptation Trajectories for Multimedia Content", under review for IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (CSVT), http://www.eeng.dcu.ie/ cranleyn/Publications/publications.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. NistNet, http://snad.ncsl.nist.gov/itg/nistnet/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/streaming/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. N. Cranley, L. Murphy, "Adaptive Quality of Service for Streamed MPEG-4 over the Internet", ICC 2001, Helsinki, Finland, June 11--14th, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. http://mpeg4ip.sourceforge.net/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Wu, T. Hou, W. Zhu, H.-J. Lee, T. Chiang, Y.-Q. Zhang, H. J. Chao, "MPEG-4 Video Transport over the Internet: A Summary," IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 43--46, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jiang, H. Schulzrinne. "Modeling of packet loss and delay and their effect on real-time multimedia service quality", in Proceedings of NOSSDAV '2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. Casner, "SDP Bandwidth Modifier for RTCP Bandwidth", draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-bw-05.txt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 3GPP TSG-SA WG4, Tdoc S4-030019, "RTCP Packet Frequency for very low bit rate sessions".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nick Feamster, Hari Balakrishnan "Packet loss recovery for streaming video", in Proceedings of 12th International Packet Video Workshop, April 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. User-perceived quality-aware adaptive delivery of MPEG-4 content

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        NOSSDAV '03: Proceedings of the 13th international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video
        June 2003
        188 pages
        ISBN:1581136943
        DOI:10.1145/776322

        Copyright © 2003 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 June 2003

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        NOSSDAV '03 Paper Acceptance Rate18of60submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate118of363submissions,33%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader