skip to main content
10.1145/780542.780585acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Evolving sets and mixing

Published:09 June 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

We show that a new probabilistic technique, recently introduced by the first author, yields the sharpest bounds obtained to date on mixing times in terms of isoperimetric properties of the state space (also known as conductance bounds or Cheeger inequalities). We prove that the bounds for mixing time in total variation obtained by Lovasz and Kannan, can be refined to apply to the maximum relative deviation |pn(x,y)/π(y)-1| of the distribution at time n from the stationary distribution π. Our approach also yields a direct link between isoperimetric inequalities and heat kernel bounds; previously, this link rested on analytic estimates known as Nash inequalities.

References

  1. Alon, N. (1986) Eigenvalues and expanders. Combinatorica 6, 83--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alon, N. and Milman, V. D. (1985). Λ, Isoperimetric inequalities for graphs and superconcentrators, J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B 38, 73--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Benjamini, I. and Mossel, E. (2002) On the mixing time of a simple random walk on the super critical percolation cluster. Probab. Th. Rel. Fields, to appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chung, F. R. K. (1996) Laplacians of graphs and Cheeger's inequalities. In Combinatorics, Paul Erdos is eighty, Vol. 2 157--172, J. Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud., Budapest.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung, F. R. K. and Yau, S. T. (1995) Eigenvalues of graphs and Sobolev inequalities, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 4, 11--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Coulhon, T. (1996). Ultracontractivity and Nash type inequalities. J. Funct. Anal. 141, 510--539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Coulhon, T., Grigoryan, A. and Pittet, C. (2001). A geometric approach to on-diagonal heat kernel lower bounds on groups. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 51, 1763--1827.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Diaconis, P. and Saloff-Coste, L. (1996). Nash inequalities for finite Markov chains. J. Theoret. Probab. 9, 459--510.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fill, J. A. (1991). Eigenvalue bounds on convergence to stationarity for nonreversible Markov chains, with an application to the exclusion process. Ann. Appl. Probab. 1, 62--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Haggstrom, O. and Jonasson, J. (1997). Rates of convergence for lamplighter processes. Stochastic Process. Appl. 67, 227--249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Houdre, C. and Tetali, P. (2001). Isoperimetric Invariants for Product Markov Chains and Graph Products Combinatorica, to appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jerrum, M. R. and Sinclair, A. J. (1989). Approximating the permanent. SIAM Journal on Computing 18, 1149--1178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kannan, R. (2002). Rapid Mixing in Markov Chains Proceedings of International Congress of Math. 2002, Vol. III, 673--683.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lawler, G. and Sokal, A. (1988). Bounds on the L2 spectrum for Markov chains and Markov processes: a generalization of Cheeger's inequality. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 309, 557--580.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lovasz, L. and R. Kannan, R. (1995). Faster mixing via average conductance Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on theory of computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mathieu, P. and Remy, E. (2003) Isoperimetry and heat kernel decay on percolation clusters. Ann. Probab., to appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mihail, M. (1989). Conductance and convergence of Markov chains - A combinatorial treatment of expanders. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, 526--531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Montenegro, R. and Son, J.-B. (2001) Edge Isoperimetry and Rapid Mixing on Matroids and Geometric Markov Chains, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on theory of computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Morris, B. (2002). A new, probabilistic approach to heat kernel bounds. Lecture at Sectional AMS meeting, Atlanta, GA, March 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pittet, C. and Saloff-Coste, L. (2002) A survey on the relationships between volume growth, isoperimetry, and the behavior of simple random walk on Cayley graphs, with examples. Unpublished manuscript, available at: http://www.math.cornell.edu/~lsc/lau.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Saloff-Coste, L. (1997). Lectures on finite Markov chains. Lecture Notes in Math. 1665, Springer, Berlin, 301--413.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sinclair, A. (1993) Algorithms for Random Generation and Counting: A Markov Chain Approach, Birkhauser, Boston. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Woess, W. (2000). Random walks on infinite graphs and groups. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 138. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evolving sets and mixing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC '03: Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
      June 2003
      740 pages
      ISBN:1581136749
      DOI:10.1145/780542

      Copyright © 2003 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 June 2003

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      STOC '03 Paper Acceptance Rate80of270submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      STOC '24
      56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
      June 24 - 28, 2024
      Vancouver , BC , Canada

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader