Douglas T. Ross
- AIA (1957a) March 26. Report of the Meeting of the AMEC/SNC Study Group for Manuscript Codes, Computer Programming and Computer Sub-Routines Held on 1 March 1957 in Los Angles, California. Los Angeles, California: Aircraft Industries Association Memo AMEC-57-34.Google Scholar
- AIA (1957b) April. Report Concerning the Meeting of the AIA/AMEC-SNC Control Data Processing Group Held at AIA, Los Angeles, California on 23--24 April 1957. Los Angeles, California: Aircraft Industries Association (draft copy; no doc. number).Google Scholar
- AIA (1957c) October 18. Report of the AMEC/Subcommittee for Numerical Control held at AIA, Los Angeles, California, on 3--4 October 1957. Los Angeles, California: Aircraft Industries Association Memo AMEC-57-87.Google Scholar
- AIA (1958) August 20. Report of AMEC/Numerical Control Panel Meeting held in Seattle on July 16--18, 1958. Los Angeles, California: Aircraft Industries Association Memo AMEC-58-44.Google Scholar
- AIA (1959) October 9. Meeting Report, Proceedings of Computer Programmers Meeting, August 24--26 (Project 358--12.3). Los Angeles, California: Aerospace Industries Association Memo MEC-59-69. (Section VIII, p. 12, starts MIT ARELEM work.)Google Scholar
- AIA (1961). APT Documentation (6 Vols.). Washington, D.C.: Aerospace Industries Association. (Results of the APT III Central Project at San Diego, California.)Google Scholar
- ANSI (1976). American National Standard Programming Language PL/1. New York: American National Standards Institute, Doc. No. ANSI X3.53--1976.Google Scholar
- Austin, L. (1959) September. Summary of September 1959 Monthly APT Progress Reports. St. Louis, Missouri: McDonnell Aircraft Corporation (no number).Google Scholar
- Benetar, V. (1957) May 10. Subject: Standard Manuscript Language, Marietta, Georgia: Lockheed Aircraft Corp. Memo to AIA AMEC/Subcommittee for Numerical Control (no number).Google Scholar
- Boeing (1957a) February 27. Part Programming Language, Numerical Control Program---Tentative. Seattle, Washington: Boeing Airplane Co. Numerical Control Mathematical Programming Memo, 1 p.Google Scholar
- Boeing (1957b) February 28. Numerical Control Library Routines A. M. C. Skin Mills---Preliminary Outline. Seattle, Washington: Boeing Airplane Co. Memo, 16 pp.Google Scholar
- Braid, I. C. (1975) April. The Synthesis of Solids Bounded By Many Faces. Communications of the ACM18(4): 209--216. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bromfield, G. (1956) January 12, Numerical Control for Machining Warped Surfaces, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab Rep. No. 6873-ER-14.Google Scholar
- Carlberg, E. F. (1957) March 27. Letter to D. T. Ross with Attachments A-F.Google Scholar
- Clements, D. F. (1957) June 21. Coordinator's Report for Period May 20-June 20. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab Memo 2D APT II-6.Google Scholar
- Clements, D. F. (1958) March 4. Letter to O. D. Smith.Google Scholar
- Coons, S. A., and Mann, R. W. (1960) October. Computer-Aided Design Related to the Engineering Design Process. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab Rep. No. 8436-TM-5, 13 pp. DDC No. AD252061.Google Scholar
- Dijkstra, E. W. (1975). Guarded Commands, Nondeterminacy and Formal Derivation of Programs. Communications of the ACM18(8): 453--457. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dobe, J. W. (1969) April. The APT Long Range Program: Progress to Date; Plans for the Future. Glen View, Illinois: Numerical Control Society Sixth Annual Meeting and Technical Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
- Everett, R. R. (1951). The Whirlwind I Computer. Proceedings of the 1951 EJCC. New York: AFIPS, p. 70.Google Scholar
- Gregory, R. H., and Atwater, T. V., Jr. (1956) March 1. Economic Studies of Work Performed on a Numerically Controlled Milling Machine. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab Rep. No. 6873-ER-18. See also Journal of Engineering8(6): 337--352 (1957).Google Scholar
- Hori, S. (1972) July. The Structure of Functions and its Application to CAM Planning. NC Scene Glen View, Illinois: Numerical Control Society. July: 2--5.Google Scholar
- IBM (1963) January. ADAPT, A System for the Automatic Programming of Numerically Controlled Machine Tools on Small Computers. San Jose, California: Final Tech. Eng. Rep. (Air Force Contract AF33(600)--43365).Google Scholar
- Kaynor, K. (1958) July 8. Memo to R. Nutt. Subject: Conclusions reached at MIT on July 2, 1958.Google Scholar
- Kinney, G. E. (1957) June 10. Letter to G. W. Jacob. Copy received by D. T. Ross 1957, June 18.Google Scholar
- Liskov, B., Snyder, A., Atkinson, R., and Schaffert, C. (1978) August. Abstraction Mechanisms in CLU. Communications of the ACM20(8): 564--576. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McIlroy, M. D. (1960) April. Macro Instruction Extensions of Compiler Languages. Communications of the ACM3(4): 214--220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McWhorter, B. J. (1958) April 10. Letter to D. T. Ross, with enclosures. Contains excellent description of IN-TRAN-DEFPRE processing method.Google Scholar
- MIT Servo Lab. (1952) July 30. Final Report on Construction and Initial Operation of a Numerically Controlled Milling Machine. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Rep. No. 6873-FR-1. Reprinted in Appendix B of Ward (1960).Google Scholar
- MIT Servo Lab. (1956) March 15. Design, Development and Evaluation of a Numerically Controlled Milling Machine. Final Report. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Rep. No. 6873-FR-2. Reprinted in Appendix A of Ward (1960).Google Scholar
- MIT Servo Lab. (1957a) January 1 through March 31. Automatic Programming for Numerically Controlled Machine Tools. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Rep. No. 6873-IR-3.Google Scholar
- MIT Servo Lab. (1957b) February 18. Programming for Numerically Controlled Machine Tools. Cambridge, Massachusetts. (Special course brochure printed by MIT Summer Session Office.)Google Scholar
- MIT Servo Lab. (1957c) March 23-April 3. Course Outline and Workbook for the Special Course on Programming for Numerically Controlled Machine Tools. Cambridge, Massachusetts (no report number).Google Scholar
- MIT Servo Lab. (1958a) January 1-June 30. Automatic Programming of Numerically Controlled Machine Tools. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Rep. No. 6873-IR-6 and 7, ASTIA No. AD-156060.Google Scholar
- MIT Servo Lab. (1958b) April. Research in Defense Techniques for Airborne Weapons, 1957 Annual Report (Vol. 2). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Servo Lab Rep. No. 7668--R-5(2).Google Scholar
- MIT Servo Lab. (1959a) February 25. APT Press Conference. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Appendix C of Ward (1960).Google Scholar
- MIT Servo Lab. (1959b). APT System Documentation. Ross, D. T. (1959) June. Vol. I, General Description of the APT System, 85 pp. Ross, D. T. (1959) May. Vol. II, APT Part Programmer's Manual, 130 pp. Ross, D. T. Vol. III, APT Calculation Methods (not published). MIT and AIA participating company staffs (1959) May. Vol. IV, A Description of the APT Computer Programs, 162 pp. Feldmann, C. G. (1959a) May. Vol. V, Operator's and Troubleshooter's Manual, 27 pp. Feldmann, C. G. (1959b) May. Vol. VI, Modification and Change Procedures, 54 pp. McAvinn, D. (1959) December. Vol. VII, Group Control for Automatic Manipulation of Computer Programs which Exceed Core Memory, 59 pp.Google Scholar
- MIT Servo Lab. (1961) January. Investigations in Computer-Aided Design (December 1, 1959 to May 30, 1960). Cambridge, Massachusetts, Interim Eng. Rep. No. 8436-IR-1.Google Scholar
- Pease, W. (1952) September. An Automatic Machine Tool. Scientific American187(3): 101--115.Google Scholar
- Perlis, A. J. (1958) March 27. Letter to D. T. Ross rejecting Ross (1957f) for publication in CACM.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1956a) February 7--9. Gestalt Programming: A New Concept in Automatic Programming. Proceedings of the 1967 WJCC. New York: AFIPS, pp. 5--9.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1956b) through 1963. Daily Resumes (unpublished). Lexington, Massachusetts (to be placed in MIT Archives), 833 pp.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1956c) November 30. Machine Tool Programming Conference No. 1 (unpublished memo draft), Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1957a) March 29. Design of Special Language for Machine-Tool Programming. Cambridge, Massachusetts, published in MIT (1957c), pp. 3/29.5--9. (Reproduced here in Section 4, in full.)Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1957b) May 1. Preparations for Joint Programming of AIA APT II System. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Rep. No. 6873-TM-2. (Distributed to AIA/AMEC/Subcommittee for Numerical Control.)Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1957c) June 14. A Proposed Basic Language for the 2D APT II. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Memo 2D APT II-2, 6 pp. (Reproduced here in Section 6, in full.)Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1957d) October 23--25. Some Recent Developments in Automatic Programming of Numerically Controlled Machine Tools. Presented at Third Annual Contour Machining Conference (no Proceedings). Published in Ross (1958a).Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1957e) November 27. Letter to B. J. McWhorter.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1957f) December 28. Development of a Research Effort in the Automatic Programming of Numerically Controlled Machine Tools. Presented at Association for Computing Machinery Session of the Indianapolis meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (no Proceedings). Published in Ross (1958a).Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1958a) January 7. Papers on Automatic Programming for Numerically Controlled Machine Tools. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Rep. No. 6873-TM-3.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1958b) April. The SLURP System for Experimental Programming. Section III-E in MIT (1958b).Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1958c) April. A Philosophy of Problem Solving. Section III-D in MIT (1958b).Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1958d) April. A Multi-Mode Control Element. Section III-C in MIT (1958b).Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1958e) April 29. 2D-APT II Post Programmer's Manual (Field Trial Version). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Memo 2D APT II-16.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1958f) July 25. Post Coordinators Report re Phase I System. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Servo Lab. Memo 2D APT II-19.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1958g) November 30. A Progress Report on the 2D-APT-II Joint Effort for Automatic Programming of Numerically Controlled Machine Tools. New York: ASME Paper No. 58-A-236 at ASME Annual Meeting. Published in condensed form, two parts, Mechanical Engineering81(5): 59--60, 70 (1959) May. Also published as Chapter II in MIT (1958a).Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1959) May. APT Part Programmer's Manual. See Vol. II of MIT (1959b).Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1960) September. Computer-Aided Design: A Statement of Objectives. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Rep. No. 8436-TM-4, DDC No. AD252060, 22 pp.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1961) March. A Generalized Technique for Symbol Manipulation and Numerical Calculation. Communications of the ACM4(3): 147--150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ross, D. T. (1962) November. An Algorithmic Theory of Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Rep. No. ESL-TM-156, DDC No. AD296998, 68 pp.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1964) September. AEDJR: An Experimental Language Processor. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Rept. No. ESL-TM-211, DDC No. 453881, 53 pp.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1975) December. Plex 1: Sameness and the Need for Rigor and Plex 2: Sameness and Type, with "are: pres. pl. of BE" (1976 April). Waltham, Massachusetts: SofTech, Rep. Nos. 9031--1.1, 2.0, and 10. Abstracted in Ross (1976).Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T. (1976) March. Toward Foundations for the Understanding of Type. SIGPLAN Notices1:8(2), Part II, Proceedings of Conference on Data: Abstraction, Definition and Structure, pp. 63--65. Abstracted from Ross (1975). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ross, D. T. (1977a) January. Structured Analysis (SA): A Language for Communicating Ideas. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering3(1): 16--34.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ross, D. T. (1977b) October. Comments on APT Items in D. T. Ross Daily Resumes (unpublished). Lexington, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T., and Clements, D. F. (1957 and 1958). Coordinator's Report(s), Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Memos: 2D APT 11-9 for Period August 1-August 30; 2D APT II-10 for Period September 1 -September 27; 2D APT II-11 for Period September 28-October 21; 2D APT II-12 for Period October 22 -February 4, 1958; 2D APT II-13 for Period February 5-March 13; 2D APT II-14 for Period March 14 -April 4; 2D APT II-15 for Period April 5-April 15; 2D APT II-17 for Period April 15-May 1.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T., and McAvinn, D. (1958) December. Data Reduction for Pre-B-58 Tests of the XMD-7 Fire-Control System. Vol. 3. Evaluation of Fire-Control System Accuracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Rep. No. 7886-R-3, ASTIA AD 207 353.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T., and Pople, H. E., Jr. (1956) June 26-December 31. Automatic Programming of Numerically Controlled Machine Tools. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Rep. Nos. 6873-IR 1 and 6873-IR-2.Google Scholar
- Ross, D. T., Rodriguez, J. E., and Feldman, C. G., eds. (1970) January. AED-0 Programmer's Guide. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab Rep. No. ESL-R-406 (published by SofTech, Waltham, Massachusetts).Google Scholar
- Runyon, J. H. (1953) December 1. Whirlwind 1 Routines for Computations for the MIT Numerically Controlled Milling Machine, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Rep. No. 6873-ER-8.Google Scholar
- Shaw, M., Wulf, W. A., and London, R. L. (1977) March. Abstraction and Verification in ALPHARD: Defining and Specifying Iteration and Generators. Communications of the ACM20(8): 553--564. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Siegel, A. (1956a) March 1. Information Processing Routine for Numerical Control. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Rep. No. 6873-ER-16.Google Scholar
- Siegel, A. (1956b) October. Automatic Programming of Numerically Controlled Machine Tools. Control Engineering3(10): 65--70.Google Scholar
- Smith, O. D. (1958 and 1959). AIA Coordinator's Report(s). Los Angeles, California: Aircraft Industries Association memos: 1. AMEC-58-17; 1958 April 4; for Period through 1958 March 14. 2. AMEC-58-45; 1958 August 25; for Period through 1958 August 7. 3. AMEC-58-47; 1958 August 27; Definition Preprocessing Memo. 4. AMEC-58-47; 1958 August 27; for Period through 1958 August 20. 5. AMEC-58-55; 1958 October 8; for Period through 1958 September 9. 6. AMEC-58-62; 1958 October 30; for Period through 1958 October 22. 7. AMEC-59-5; 1959 January 20; for Period through 1959 January 13. 8. AMEC-59-11; 1959 February 24; Work Assignments 1959 February 18.Google Scholar
- Smith, O. D., and Corley, C. F. (1958) February 10. APT-II Arithmetic Program. Los Angeles, California: North American Aviation. SHARE-type writeup submission to 2D APT II Field Trial.Google Scholar
- Swift, C. J. (1957) October 24. Letter to E. F. Carlberg.Google Scholar
- Voelcker, H. B., and Requicha, A. A. G. (1977) December. Geometric Modeling of Mechanical Parts and Processes. IEEE Computer10(2): 48--57.Google Scholar
- Ward, J. E. (1960) January 15. Automatic Programming of Numerically Controlled Machine Tools. Final Report. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Servo Lab. Rep. No. 6873-FR-3.Google Scholar
- Ward, J. E. (1968). Numerical Control of Machine Tools. New York: McGraw Hill Yearbook of Science and Technology, pp. 58--65.Google Scholar
- Wirth, N., and Hoare, C. A. R. (1966) June. A Contribution to the Development of ALGOL. Communications of the ACM9(6): 413--431. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
APT Detector: Detect and Identify APT Malware Based on Deep Learning Framework
ICCAI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 9th International Conference on Computing and Artificial IntelligenceAdvanced persistent threat (APT) attacks use sophisticated attack techniques and covert command and control (C&C) channels to conduct long-term sustained cyber attacks on specific targets as unobtrusively as possible. Over the past ten years, APT ...
Toward Identifying APT Malware through API System Calls
Self-developed malware was usually used by advanced persistent threat (APT) attackers to launch APT attacks. Therefore, we can enhance the understanding and cognition of APT attacks by comprehending the behavior of APT malware. Unfortunately, the current ...
HTTP-Based APT Malware Infection Detection Using URL Correlation Analysis
APT malware exploits HTTP to establish communication with a C & C server to hide their malicious activities. Thus, HTTP-based APT malware infection can be discovered by analyzing HTTP traffic. Recent methods have been dependent on the extraction of ...
Comments