skip to main content
10.1145/846241.846257acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagestarkConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Knowledge in quantum systems

Published:20 June 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper applies to quantum systems a modelling for the logic of knowledge, originally developed for reasoning about distributed systems, but since then applied to game theory, computer security and artificial intelligence. A formal model of quantum message passing systems is developed and the question of how one might define the semantics of a modal operator for knowledge in this model is considered. It is argued that there are at least two plausible semantics, depending on whether the agents are permitted to make use of their quantum state in determining what they know, and on whether one is dealing with single instances of quantum systems, or ensembles. The framework is illustrated using a number of examples from the quantum computing literature, including protocols for quantum key distribution and teleportation.

References

  1. {BBB+92} C. H. Bennet, F. Bessette, G. Brassard, L. Salvail, and J. Smolin. Experimental quantum cryptography. Journal of Cryptology, 5(1):3--28, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. {BBC+93} C. H. Bennet, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Josza, A. Peres, and W. K. Wooters. Teleporting unknown quantum states via dual classical and EPR chnnels. Physical Review Letters, 70(13):1895--1899, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. {BDHT99} H. Buhrman, W. van Dam, P. Hoyer, and A. Tapp. Multiparty quantum communication complexity. Physical Review A, 60(4):2737--2741, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. {Ben92} C. H. Bennet. Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. Physical Review Letters, 68(21):3121--3124, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. {CFS02} C. M. Caves, C. A. Fuchs, and R. Schack. Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities. Physical Review A, 65:022305, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. {EWL99} J. Eisert, M. Wilkens, and M. Lewenstein. Quantum games and quantum strategies. Physical Review Letters, 83:3077--3088, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. {FHMV95} R. Fagin, J. Y. Halpern, Y. Moses, and M. Y. Vardi. Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. {HM90} J. Y. Halpern and Y. Moses. Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment. Journal of the ACM, 37(3):549--587, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. {IY94} A. Imamoglu and Y. Yamamoto. Turnstile device for heralded single photons: Coulomb blockade of electron and hole tunneling in quantum confined p-i-n heterojunctions. Physical Review Letters, 72(2):210--213, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. {MP03} R. van der Meyden and M. Patra. A logic for probability in quantum systems. submitted for publication, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. {NC00} M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. CUP, Cambridge, UK., 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. {Wig62} E.P. Wigner. Remarks on the mind-body question. In I.J Good, editor, The Scientist Speculates, pages 284--301. Heinemann, London, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Knowledge in quantum systems

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                TARK '03: Proceedings of the 9th conference on Theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge
                June 2003
                245 pages
                ISBN:1581137311
                DOI:10.1145/846241

                Copyright © 2003 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 20 June 2003

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate61of177submissions,34%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader