skip to main content
10.1145/860575.860637acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A multi-agent system for the quantitative simulation of biological networks

Published:14 July 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

We apply the multi-agent system (MAS) platform to the task of biological network simulation. In this paper, we describe the simulation of signal transduction (ST) networks using the DECAF [9] MAS architecture. Unlike previous approaches that relied on systems of differential equations (DE), the distributed framework of MAS scales well and allows us to model large, highly interconnected ST pathways. This scalability is achieved by adopting a hybrid strategy that factors macro-level measures, such as reaction rateconstants, to calculate the stochastic kinetics at the level of individual molecules. Thus, by capturing the ST domain at an intermediate level of abstraction, we are able to retain much of the granularity afforded by a purely individual-based approach. The task distribution within a MAS enables us to model certain physical properies, such as diffusion and subcellular compartmentalization, which have proven to be difficult for DE systems. We demonstrate that large-grained agents are well suited to maintaining interal state representations and efficient in computing reactant concentration, both of which are vital considerations in modeling the ST domain. In our system, a molecular species is modeled as an individual agent with hierarchical task network structures to represent self- and externally-initiated reactions. An agent's identity is determined by a rule file (one for every participating molecular species) that specifies the reactions it may participate in, as well as its initial concentration. Reactions within the system are actuated by inter-agent communication. We present results from modeling the well-studied epidermal growth factor (EGF) pathway, demonstrating the viability of MAS technologies as a simulation platform for biological networks.

References

  1. R. Alur, C. Belta, and et al. Hybrind modeling and simulation of biomolecular networks. In Fourth Intl Wksp on Hybrid Sys., pages 19--32, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Arkin, J. Ross, and H. McAdams. Stochastic kinetic analysis of phage-lambda infected e.coli cells. Genetics, 149:1633--1648, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. U. Bhalla and R. Iyengar. Emergent properties of networks of biological signal pathways. Science, 283:381--387, January 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. Bray, R. Bourett, and M. Simon. Computer simulation of the phosphorylation cascade controlling bacterial chemotaxis. Mol. Biol. Cell, 4:469--482, 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Eker, M. Knapp, K. Laderoute, and P. Lincoln. Pathway logic: Symbolic analysis of biological computing. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pages 400--412, January 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Endy and R. Brent. Modelling cellular behaviour. Nature, 409:391--395, January 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. P. Erdi and J. Toth. Mathematical Models of Chemical Reactions. Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1989.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Firth and D. Bray. Stochastic simulation of cell signaling pathways. Comp. Model. Gen. Bio. Net., pages 263--286, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Graham and K. Decker. Towards a distributed, environment-centered agent framework. Intelligent Agents VI, LNAI-1757:290--304, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Hallett. The unpredictability of cellular behaviour: trivial or fundamental importance to biology? Perspect. Biol. Med., 33:110--119, 1989.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C. Jonker, J. Snoep, J. Truer, and W. Wijngaards. Bdi-modelling of intracellular dynamics. In Bioinformatics and Multi-agent Systems, pages 15--23, July 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Kerdelo, J. Abgrall, and J. Tisseau. Multi-agent systems: a useful tool for the modelization and simulation of the blood coagulation cascade. In Bioinformatics and Multi-agent Systems, pages 33--36, July 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. B. Kholodenko, O. Demin, and et al. Quantification of short term signaling by the egf receptor. J. Biol. Chem., 269:15756--15761, 1994.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H. Lodish, A. Berk, L. Zipursky, D. Baltimore, and J. Darnell. Molecular Cell Biology. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. P. Mendes. Gepasi: a software package for modeling the dynamics, steady states and control of biochemical and other systems. Comput. Appl. Biosci., 9:563--571, 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Paruchuri, A. Pullalarevu, and K. Karlapalem. Multi-agent simulation of unorganized traffic. In First Conf. of Aut. Agents and MAS, pages 176--183, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Peleg, I. Yeh, and R. Altman. Modelling biological processes using workflow and petri net models. Bioinfo. J., 18(6):825--837, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. L. Pouchard, R. Ward, and M. Leuze. An agent modelling approach to complex biological pathways. In Bioinformatics and Multi-agent Systems, pages 37--39, July 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Regev, W. Shapiro, and E. Shapiro. Representation and simulation of biochemical processes using the π-calculus process algebra. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pages 459--470, January 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. B. Schoeberl, C. Jonsosson, E. Giles, and G. Muller. Computational modeling of the dynamics of the map kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized egf receptors. Nature Biotech., 20:370--375, April 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. D. Voet and J. Voet. Biochemistry. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. Weng, U. Bhalla, and R. Iyengar. Complexity in biological signal systems. Science, 284:92--96, April 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A multi-agent system for the quantitative simulation of biological networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      AAMAS '03: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
      July 2003
      1200 pages
      ISBN:1581136838
      DOI:10.1145/860575

      Copyright © 2003 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 July 2003

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,155of5,036submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader