S S. Nemani
ABSTRACT
Using NAMS (Negotiating Agents and Marital Stability), a couple who is considering marriage is aided in evaluating their compatibility. Using a vector of fundamental emotions, our algebra of emotion allows us to model self-generating emotions (such an interest or anger), have history-sensitive interactions, and accommodate gender differences.
- K. Carley and L. Gasser. Computational Organization Theory. In G. Weiss, editor, Muliagent Systems, pages 199--330. MIT Press, Long, England, 1999. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- F. Fincham, J. Grych, and L. Osborne. Interparental conflict and child adjustment: A longitudinal analysis. In Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA, March 1993.Google Scholar
- B. J. Fowers, K. H. Montel, and D. H. Olson. Predicting marital success for premarital couple types based on PREPARE. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 22:103--119, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Gmytrasiewicz and C. Lisetti. Using Decision Theory to Formalize Emotions for Multi-Agent System Applications. In Second ICMAS-2000 Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents, Boston, Massachusetts, 2000.Google Scholar
- L. Goldberg. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. D. Fruyt, and F.Ostendorf, editors, Personality psychology in Europe. 1999.Google Scholar
- J. Gottman, editor. What Predicts Divorce: The Measures. L. Erlbaum, 1996.Google Scholar
- J. Gottman, J. Coan, S. Carrere, and C. Swanson. Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60:5--22, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Gratch and S. Marsella. Tears and Fears: Modeling emotions and emotional behaviors in synthetic agents. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Montreal,Canada, June 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Izard. The Psychology of Emotions. Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Markman, S. Stanley, and S. Blumberg. Fighting for your marriage : Positive Steps For A Loving and Lasting Relationship. Jossey-Bass, Inc, San Francisco,CA, 1994.Google Scholar
- B. Tomlinson, M. Downie, M. Berlin, J. Gray, D. Lyons, J. Cochran, and B. Blumberg. Leashing the AlphaWolves. In ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Computer animation, San Antonio,TX, July 2002.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Agents and the algebra of emotion
Recommendations
Do all facial emojis communicate emotion? The impact of facial emojis on perceived sender emotion and text processing
AbstractFacial emojis can express a variety of positive and negative emotions, and are commonly used in digital, written communication. However, little is known about how emojis impact text processing and how different emoji-text combinations ...
Highlights- We investigated how facial emojis impact text comprehension using behavioral ratings and EEG.
The effect of expression of anger and happiness in computer agents on negotiations with humans
AAMAS '11: The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3There is now considerable evidence in social psychology, economics, and related disciplines that emotion plays an important role in negotiation. For example, humans make greater concessions in negotiation to an opposing human who expresses anger, and ...
Towards Modeling the Interplay of Personality, Motivation, Emotion, and Mood in Social Agents
AAMAS '19: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent SystemsCreating social agents that interact in believable ways is a challenging task. The agent's emotional state must be faithfully modeled and should bear an influence on its behavior. In this paper, we introduce a computational model of affect which ...
Comments