skip to main content
10.1145/872757.872829acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

QCluster: relevance feedback using adaptive clustering for content-based image retrieval

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 June 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

The learning-enhanced relevance feedback has been one of the most active research areas in content-based image retrieval in recent years. However, few methods using the relevance feedback are currently available to process relatively complex queries on large image databases. In the case of complex image queries, the feature space and the distance function of the user's perception are usually different from those of the system. This difference leads to the representation of a query with multiple clusters (i.e., regions) in the feature space. Therefore, it is necessary to handle disjunctive queries in the feature space.In this paper, we propose a new content-based image retrieval method using adaptive classification and cluster-merging to find multiple clusters of a complex image query. When the measures of a retrieval method are invariant under linear transformations, the method can achieve the same retrieval quality regardless of the shapes of clusters of a query. Our method achieves the same high retrieval quality regardless of the shapes of clusters of a query since it uses such measures. Extensive experiments show that the result of our method converges to the user's true information need fast, and the retrieval quality of our method is about 22% in recall and 20% in precision better than that of the query expansion approach, and about 34% in recall and about 33% in precision better than that of the query point movement approach, in MARS.

References

  1. T. Ashwin, R. Gupta, and S. Ghosal. Adaptable similarity search using non-relevant information. In Proceedings of the 28th VLDB Conference. Hong Kong, China, August 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. I. Bartolini, P. Ciacci, and F. Waas. Feedbackbypass: A new approach to interactive similarity query processing. In Proceedings of the 27th VLDB Conference, pages 201--210. Roma, Italy, September 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Bauer, U. Gather, and M. Imhoff. The identification of multiple outliers in online monitoring data. Technical Report 29, SFB 475, University of Dortmund, 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Bhanu and A. Dong. Concepts learning with fuzzy clustering and relevance feedback. In Proceedings Workshop on Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition, pages 102--116, July 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Brunelli and O. Mich. Image retrieval by examples. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2(3):164--171, September 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Chakrabarti and S. Mehrotra. The hybrid tree: An index structure for high dimensional feature spaces. In Proceedings of 5th Int'l Conference on Data Engineering, pages 440--447. Sydney, Australia, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. Chakrabarti, K. Porkaew, and S. Mehrotra. Efficient query refinement in multimedia databases. In Proceedings of the IEEE Int'l Conference on Data Engineering, page 196. San Diego, USA, Feburary 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Charikar, C. Chekuri, T. Feder, and R. Motwani. Incremental clustering and dynamic information retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM STOC Conference, pages 626--635, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. D. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork. Pattern Classification. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Flickner, H. Sawhney, and W. N. et al. Query by image and video content: The qbic system. IEEE Computer Magazine, 28(9):23--32, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Ishikawa, R. Subramanya, and C. Faloutsos. Mindreader: Querying databases through multiple examples. In Proceedings of the 24th VLDB Conference, pages 218--227. New York, USA, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. A. Johnson and D. W. Wichern. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, N.J., 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Porkaew and K. Chakrabarti. Query refinement for multimedia similarity retrieval in mars. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Multimedia Conference, pages 235--238. Orlando, Florida, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. J. Rocchio. Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval, in G. Salton ed., The SMART Retrieval System - Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1971.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Y. Rui, T. Huang, and S. Mehrotra. Content-based image retrieval with relevance feedback in mars. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing '97. Santa Barbara, CA, October 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Y. Rui, T. Huang, M. Ortega, and S. Mehrotra. Relevance feedback: A power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 8(5):644--655, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G. Salton, E. A. Fox, and H. Wu. Extended boolean information retrieval. Communications of the ACM, 26(11):1022--1036, November 1983.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. R. Smith and S. F. Chang. Visualseek: A fully automated content-based image query system. In Proceedings of the ACM Int'l Multimedia Conference, pages 87--98, November 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. Wang, Y. Rui, and S.-M. Hu. Optimal adaptive learning for image retrieval. In Proceedings of IEEE CVPR 2001, pages 1140--1147. Kauai, Hawaii, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. L. Wu, C. Faloutsos, K. Sycara, and T. R. Payne. Falcon: Feedback adaptive loop for content-based retrieval. In Proceedings of the 26th VLDB Conference, pages 297--306. Cairo, Egypt, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. X. S. Zhou and T. S. Huang. Comparing discriminating transformations and svm for learning during multimedia retrieval. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Multimedia Conference, pages 137--146. Orlando, Florida, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. QCluster: relevance feedback using adaptive clustering for content-based image retrieval

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                SIGMOD '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
                June 2003
                702 pages
                ISBN:158113634X
                DOI:10.1145/872757

                Copyright © 2003 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 9 June 2003

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                SIGMOD '03 Paper Acceptance Rate53of342submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate785of4,003submissions,20%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader