skip to main content
10.1145/944868.944908acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A qualitative assessment of the efficacy of UML diagrams as a form of graphical documentation in aiding program understanding

Published:12 October 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Graphical documentation is often characterized as an effective aid in program understanding. However, it is an open question exactly which types of graphical documentation are most suitable for which types of program understanding tasks (and in which specific usage contexts). The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is the de facto standard for modeling modern software applications. This paper describes an experiment to assess the qualitative efficacy of UML diagrams in aiding program understanding. The experiment had participants analyze a series of UML diagrams and answer a detailed questionnaire concerning a hypothetical software system. Results from the experiment suggest that the UML's efficacy in support of program understanding is limited by factors such as ill-defined syntax and semantics, spatial layout, and domain knowledge.

References

  1. Ambler, S. The Elements of UML Style. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Budgen, D.; Hoffnagle, G.; Muller, M.; Robert, F.; Sellami, A.; and Tilley, S. "Empirical Software Engineering: A Roadmap." Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP 2002: Oct. 6-8, 2002; Montreal, Canada). IEEE Computer Society Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chikofsy, E.; and Cross, J. "Reverse Engineering and Design Recovery: A Taxonomy." IEEE Software 7(1):13--17, January 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Huang, S. and Tilley, S. "Workshop on Graphical Documentation for Programmers: Assessing the Efficacy of UML Diagrams for Program Understanding." Held in conjunction with The 11th International Conference on Program Comprehension (IWPC 2003: May 10-11, 2003; Portland, OR). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. IBM Corp. "UML Resource Center". Online at http://www.rational.com/uml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. IBM Corporation. "The Rational Unified Process (RUP)." Online at http://www.rational.com/products/rup/index.jsp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Knight, C.; Munro, M. "Comprehension with{in} Virtual Environment Visualizations". Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Program Comprehension (IWPC 1999: May 5-7, 1999; Pittsburgh, PA, USA), pp. 4--11. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Koning, H.; Dormann, C.; and van Vliet, H. "Practical Guidelines for the Readability of IT-Architecture Diagrams." Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC 2002: October 20-23, 2002; Toronto, Canada), pp. 90--99. ACM Press: New York, NY, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kruchten, P. "Architectural Blueprints-The '4+1' View Model of Software Architecture." IEEE Software 12(6):42--50, November 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Medvidovic, N.; Rosenblum, D.; Redmiles, D.; and Robbins, J. "Modeling Software Architecture in the Unified Modeling Language." ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodology 11(1):2--57, January 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Muller, H.; Tilley, S.; Orgun, M.; Corrie, B.; and Madhavji, N. "A Reverse Engineering Environment Based on Spatial and Visual Software Interconnection Models." Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Development Environments (SIGSOFT '92/SDE 5: Tyson's Corner, VA; December 9-11, 1992), pp. 88--98. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Object Management Group (OMG). "UML 2.0 Standard Officially Adopted at OMG Technical Meeting in Paris." June 12, 2003. Online at http://www.omg.org/news/releases/pr2003/6-12-032.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Object Management Group. Online at http://www.omg.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pierce, R. and Tilley, S. "Automatically Connecting Documentation to Code with Rose". Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC 2002: October 20-23, 2002; Toronto, Canada), pp. 157-163. ACM Press: New York, NY, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Purchase, H.; Colpoys, L.; McGill, M.; and Carrington, D. "UML Collaboration Diagram Syntax: An Empirical Study of Comprehension." Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis (VISSOFT 2002: June 26-27, 2002; Paris, France). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rational Software Corp. "PearlCircle." Online at http://rdatux.rational.com/auction/index.jsp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tilley, S. "The Canonical Activities of Reverse Engineering." Annals of Software Engineering 9:249--271, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Tilley, S. and Huang, S. "Assessing the Efficacy of Software Architecture Visualization Techniques for Recovered Artifacts." Dagstuhl Seminar 03061: Software Architecture Recovery and Modeling (Feb. 2 - 7, 2003; Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tilley, S. and Huang, S. "Documenting Software Systems with Views III: Towards a Task-Oriented Classification of Program Visualization Techniques". Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC 2002: October 20-23, 2002; Toronto, Canada), pp. 226--233. ACM Press: New York, NY, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Tilley, S. and Huang, S. "On Selecting Software Visualization Tools for Program Understanding in an Industrial Context." Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Program Comprehension (IWPC 2002: June 26-29, 2002; Paris, France), pp. 285-288. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tilley, S. and Huang, S. "On the Emergence of the Renaissance Software Engineer." Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Web Site Evolution (WSE'99). Atlanta, GA: October 5, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tilley, S. and Wong, K. "Workshop on Graphical Documentation for Programmers." Held in conjunction with The 20th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC 2002: October 21, 2002; Toronto, Canada). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tilley, S.; Smith, D.; and Thomas, B. "Documentation for Software Engineers: What is Needed to Aid System Understanding?" Held in conjunction with The 19th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC 2001: Santa Fe, NM; October 21-24, 2001). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A qualitative assessment of the efficacy of UML diagrams as a form of graphical documentation in aiding program understanding

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGDOC '03: Proceedings of the 21st annual international conference on Documentation
          October 2003
          222 pages
          ISBN:158113696X
          DOI:10.1145/944868

          Copyright © 2003 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 October 2003

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader