- E. W. Dijkstra, Notes on structured programming, in: Structured programming, Academic Press, London (1972), 1--82]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. van Wijngaarden, B. J. Mailloux, J. E. L. Peck, C. H. A. Koster, M. Sintzoff, C. H. Lindsey, L. G. L. T. Meertens, and R. G. Fisker, Revised report on the algorithmic language ALGOL 68, Supplement to ALGOL Bulletin 36, Technical Report TR74-3 (March 1974), Dept. of Computing Science, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada]]Google Scholar
- M. Clint and C. A. R. Hoare, Program proving: jumps and functions, Acta Informatica 1 (1972) 214--224]]Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Wegner, Tree-structured programs, Comm. ACM 16 (1973), 704--705]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. A. Wulf, Programming without the _GOTO_, IFIP Congress, Ljubljana (1971), preprint TA3, 84--88]]Google Scholar
- D. E. Knuth and R. W. Floyd, Notes on avoiding _GOTO_ statements, Information processing letters 1 (1971), 23--31 and 177]]Google Scholar
- F. L. Friedman and V. B. Schneider, A programming language for mini-computer systems, ACM SIGPLAN Notices 9 (Jan. 1974), 8--32]] Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
General-purpose multiparadigm programming languages: an enabling technology for constructing complex systems
ICECCS '95: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer SystemsMultiparadigm programming languages have been envisioned as a vehicle for constructing large and complex heterogeneous systems, such as a stock market exchange or a telecommunications network. General-purpose multiparadigm languages, as opposed to ...
Comments