skip to main content
10.1145/956863.956949acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

iTopN: incremental extraction of the N most visible objects

Published:03 November 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

The visual exploration of large databases calls for a tight coupling of database and visualization systems. Current visualization systems typically fetch all the data and organize it in a scene tree, which is then used to render the visible data. For immersive data explorations, where an observer navigates in a potentially huge data space and explores selected data regions this approach is inadequate. A scalable approach is to make the database system observer-aware and exchange the data that is visible and most relevant to the observer.In this paper we present iTopN an incremental algorithm for extracting the most visible objects relative to the current position of the observer. We implement iTopN and compare it to an improved version of the R-tree that extends LRU with the caching of the top levels of the R-tree (LW-LRU). Our experiments show that iTopN is orders of magnitude faster than LW-LRU given the same amount of memory. Our experiments also show that for LW-LRU to perform as fast as iTopN it needs three times as much memory.

References

  1. N. Beckmann, H.-P. Kriegel, R. Schneider, and B. Seeger. The r*-tree: An efficient and robust access method for points and rectangles. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data pages 322--331. ACM Press, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Berchtold, D. A. Keim, and H.-P. Kriegel. The x-tree: An index structure for high-dimensional data. In Proceedings of 22th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pages 28--39. Morgan Kaufmann, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Böhlen, L. Bukauskas, P. S. Eriksen, S. L. Lauritzen, A. Mažeika, P. Musaeus, and P. Mylov. 3D Visual Data Mining: Goals and Experiences. In Journal Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, of the International Association of Statistical Computing, 43, pages 445--469, Elsevier Science, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Guttman. R-trees: A dynamic index structure for spatial searching. In SIGMOD'84, Proceedings of Annual Meeting, pages 47--57. ACM Press, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. M. Hellerstein, J. F. Naughton, and A. Pfeffer. Generalized search trees for database systems. In Proceedings of 21th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pages 562--573. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Henrich. The lsdh-tree: An access structure for feature vectors. In Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Data Engineering, pages 362--369. IEEE Computer Society, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Kofler, M. Gervautz, and M. Gruber. R-trees for organizing and visualizing 3d gis databases. Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 11(3), pages 129--143, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. T. Robinson. The k-d-b-tree: A search structure for large multidimensional dynamic indexes. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 10--18. ACM Press, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. Shou, J. Chionh, Z. Huang, K.-L. Tan, and Y. Ruan. Walking through a very large virtual environment in real-time. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pages 401--410. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Z. Song and N. Roussopoulos. K-nearest neighbor search for moving query point. In Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases, 7th International Symposium, SSTD, pages 79--96. Springer, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Tao and D. Papadias. Time-parameterized queries in spatio-temporal databases. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 334--345. ACM Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Varadhan and D. Manocha. Out-of-core rendering of massive geometric environments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Visualization '02, pages 69--76. IEEE Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Šaltenis, C. S. Jensen, S. T. Leutenegger, and M. A. Lopez. Indexing the positions of continuously moving objects. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, volume 29, pages 331--342. ACM Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. A. White and R. Jain. Similarity indexing with the ss-tree. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Data Engineering, pages 516--523. IEEE Computer Society, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. iTopN: incremental extraction of the N most visible objects

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '03: Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on Information and knowledge management
        November 2003
        592 pages
        ISBN:1581137230
        DOI:10.1145/956863

        Copyright © 2003 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2003

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader