skip to main content
10.1145/958160.958167acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Text chat in action

Published:09 November 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Synchronous text communication is becoming recognized as a valuable workplace communication medium yet some studies of group text chat indicate that its properties can lead to interactional incoherence. We consider this issue through a detailed analytic examination of text chat transcripts by showing how participants manage their interactions through considering multiple threads, turn taking and topic change. We reveal the routine practices that participants employ to create and manage coherent interaction. These practices arise from the turn taking system in operation, which facilitates straightforward repair of misunderstandings. We conclude by considering the implications of this for design and for the organisation and management of interactions of various forms.

References

  1. J. Bowers, J. Pycock, & J. O'Brien, (1996) Talk and Embodiment in Collaborative Virtual Environments. Proc. CHI'96, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Bowers, and D. Martin, (2000). Machinery In The New Factories: Talk and Technology in a Bank's Call Centre. Proceedings of CSCW 2000, Copyright 2000 ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Bradner, WA Kellogg, & T. Erickson, (1999) The adoption and use of Babble : A field study of chat in the workplace. ECSCW 1999 139--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Churchill, & S. Bly, (1999) It's all in the words: supporting work activities with lightweight tools. GROUP 99. 40--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Connell, et al (2001) Effects of communication medium on interpersonal perceptions : Don't hang up on the telephone yet! GROUP'01. 117--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Ess, (Ed) (2001) Culture, Technology, Communication: Towards an Intercultural Global Village (Suny Series in Computer-Mediated Communication). State Univ of New York Pr. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Garcia, & J. Jacobs, (1999) The eyes of the beholder : Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32 (4). 337--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. H. Garfinkel, (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. Hale, (1996) Wired Style: Principles of English Usage in the Digital Age, HardWired, San Francisco. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Handel, & J. Herbsleb, (2002) I M everywhere: What is chat doing in the workplace? http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=587080&coll=portal&dl=ACM&CFID=7274308&CFTOKEN=71225374 CSCW'02. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C. C. Heath, & P. Luff, (1991) Disembodied conduct: communication through video in a multimedia office environment, in Proc. Of CHI '91, ACM Press 99--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. C. C. Heath, and P. Luff (2000) Technology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. Heritage, (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Herring, (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication {On-line}, 4 (4). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/herring.html (30/1/03).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E. Isaacs, et al (2002) I M everywhere: The character, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace. CHI'02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Levinson, (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, and C. C. Heath, (eds.) (2000) Workplace Studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. S. McDaniel, G. Olson, & J. Magee, (1996) Identifying and Analyzing Multiple Threads in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-face Conversation. In CSCW'96 ACM. 39--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. McGrath, (1990) "Time Matters in Groups", Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technical Foundations of Cooperative Work, J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut, and C. Egido (Eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990, pp. 23--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. B. Nardi, S. Whittaker, E. Bradner, (2000) Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. CSCW'02. 79--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G. (1974) A simplest sytematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50. 696--735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. M. Smith, J. Cadiz, and B. Burkhalter, (2000) Conversation Trees and Threaded Chat. CSCW'00 ACM. 97--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. F. Viegas, & J. Donath, (1999) Chat Circles. Proc. Of CHI'99 ACM. 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Text chat in action

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              GROUP '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
              November 2003
              390 pages
              ISBN:1581136935
              DOI:10.1145/958160

              Copyright © 2003 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 9 November 2003

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader