skip to main content
10.1145/964442.964479acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Magpie: supporting browsing and navigation on the semantic web

Published:13 January 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe several advanced functionalities of Magpie -- a tool that assists users with interpreting the web resources. Magpie is an extension to the Internet Explorer that automatically creates a semantic layer for web pages using a user-selected ontology. Semantic layers are annotations of a web page, with a set of applicable semantic services attached to the annotated items. We argue that the ability to generate different semantic layers for a web resource is vital to support the interpretation of web pages. Moreover, the assignment of semantic web services to the entities allows users to browse their neighbourhood semantically. At the same time, the Magpie suite offers trigger functionality based on the patterns of an automatically updated semantic log. The benefits of such an approach are illustrated by a semantically enriched browsing history management.

References

  1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O., The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 2001. 279(5): p.34--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Carr, L., Bechhofer, S., Goble, C., et al. Conceptual Linking: Ontology-based Open Hypermedia. In Proc. of the 10th Intl. WWW Conf. 2001. Hong-Kong. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chakrabarti, S., Srivastava, S., Subramanyam, M., et al. Using Memex to archive and mine community Web browsing experience. In Proc. of the 9th Intl. WWW Conf. 2000. The Netherlands. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dzbor, M., Domingue, J., and Motta, E., Magpie: Towards a Semantic Web Browser. In Proc. of the 2nd Intl. Semantic Web Conf. 2003. Florida, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gruber, T.R., A Translation approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 1993. 5(2): p.199--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Guarino, N., Masolo, C., and Vetere, G., OntoSeek: Content-Based Access to the Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 1999. 14(3): p.70--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Handschuh, S., Staab, S., and Maedche, A., CREAM - Creating relational metadata with a component-based, ontology driven annotation framework. In Proc. of the Intl. Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS). 2001. California, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kahan, J., Koivunen, M.-R., Prud'Hommeaux, E., et al. Annotea: An Open RDF Infrastructure for Shared Web Annotations. In Proc. of the 10th Intl. WWW Conf. 2001. Hong-Kong. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Karger, D.R., Katz, B., Lin, J., et al. Sticky Notes for the Semantic Web. In Proc. of the Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI). 2003. Florida, US. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lieberman, H., Nardi, B.A., and Wright, D., Training Agents to Recognize Text by Example. In Proc. of the 3rd Intl. Conf. on Autonomous Agents. 1999. Washington, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lieberman, H., Fry, C., and Weitzman, L., Exploring the web with reconnaissance Agents. Comm. of the ACM, 2001. 44(8): p.69--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lieberman, H. and Wagner, E., End-user Debugging for E-Commerce. In Proc. of the Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI). 2003. Florida, US. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. McGuinness, D.L. Ontological Issues for Knowledge-Enhanced Search. In Proc. of Formal Ontology in Information Systems. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ovsiannikov, I.A., Arbib, M.A., and Mcneill, T.H., Annotation Technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1999. 50(4): p.329--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Sadiq, W. and Kumar, S., Web Service Description (Usage Scenarios). 2002, WWW Consortium. (URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-ws-desc-usecases-20020604).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tauscher, L. and Greenberg, S., How People Revisit Web Pages: Empirical Findings and Implications for the Design of History Systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 2001. 47(1): p.97--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Magpie: supporting browsing and navigation on the semantic web

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IUI '04: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
        January 2004
        396 pages
        ISBN:1581138156
        DOI:10.1145/964442

        Copyright © 2004 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 January 2004

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        IUI '04 Paper Acceptance Rate72of140submissions,51%Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader