skip to main content
10.1145/967900.967959acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A relational approach to the capture of DICOM files for Grid-enabled medical imaging databases

Published:14 March 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Standard for Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) specifies a non-proprietary digital imaging format, file structure and data interchange protocols for the transfer of biomedical images and non-image data related to such images--it is a specification of the components that are required in order to achieve inter-operability between biomedical imaging computer systems. In this paper we describe how a Grid-enabled medical imaging database---eDiaMoND--employs an object-relational approach to the storage of DICOM files. Although the work described has been carried out within the context of a particular mammography related project, the underlying principles are applicable to other medical imaging systems dealing either with other modalities or with other diseases.

References

  1. M. Baum and S. Denton. Breast Cancer: The Facts. Oxford Medical Publications, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F. Berman, G. C. Fox, and A. J. G. Hey, editors. Grid Computing: Making The Global Infrastructure a Reality. Wiley, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. W. D. Bidgood Jr, L. Y. Korman, A. M. Golichowski, P. L. Hildebrand, A. R. Mori, B. Bray, N. J. G. Brown, K. A. Spackman, S. B. Dove, and K. Schoeffler. Medical data standards: controlled terminology for clinically-relevant indexing and selective retrieval of biomedical images. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 1(3):278--287, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: BI-RADS. www.acr.org/departments/stand_accred/birads.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. G. Blanks, S. M. Moss, C. McGahan, M. J. Quinn, and P. J. Babb. Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990--8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality. British Medical Journal, 321:665--669, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. M. Brady, D. J. Gavaghan, A. C. Simpson, M. M. Parada, and R. P. Highnam. eDiaMoND: A grid-enabled federated database of annotated mammograms. In F. Berman, G. C. Fox, and A. J. G. Hey, editors, Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality, pages 923--943. Wiley Series, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Connolly and C. Begg. Database Systems: A Practical Approach to Design, Implementation, and Management. Addison-Wesley, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. B. Dean. Overview of breast cancer screening. In M. Doi, M. L. Giger, R. M. Nishikawa, and R. A. Schmidt, editors, 3rd International Workshop on Digital Mammography, volume 1119 of Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, pages 19--26. Elsevier Science, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. A. Epstein, M. S. Pasieka, W. P. Lord, S. T. Wong, and N. Mankovich. Security for the digital information age of medicine: Issues, applications, and implementation. Journal of Digital Imaging, 11(1):33--44, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Esteve, A. Kricker, J. Ferlay, and D. M. Parkin. Facts and figures of cancer in the European Community. Technical report, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Forrest. Breast Cancer Screening. Report to the Health Ministers of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. HMSO, London, UK, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. I. Foster and C. Kesselman, editors. The GRID: Blueprint For A New Computing Infrastructure. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Globus Toolkit. http://www-unix.globus.org/Globus, June 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. P. Highnam and J. M. Brady. Mammographic Image Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. K. Johnston and J. Brown. Two view mammography at incident screens: cost effectiveness analysis of policy options. British Medical Journal, 319:1097--1102, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Y. Kim. Requirements for PACS workstation. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Image Management and Communication in Patient Care, Kyoto. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. National Digital Mammography Archive. http://nscp01.physics.upenn.edu/ndma/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. The NHS Cancer Plan. www.doh.gov.uk/cancer/cancerplan.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Open Grid Services Architecture - Data Access and Integration, OGSA-DAI. http://www.ogsa-dai.org, April 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Open Grid Services Architecture - Distributed Query Processor, OGSA-DQP. http://www.ogsa-dai.org/dqp/, August 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Open Grid Services Infrastructure (OGSI) Version 1.0. http://www-unix.globus.org/toolkit/draft-ggf-ogsigridservice-33_2003-06-27.pdf, June 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Patnick, editor. NHS Breast Screening Programme Review 1996. NHS Breast Screening Programme, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. V. L. Shavers and M. L. Brown. Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94(5):334--357, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. J. Smith, A. Gounaris, P. Watson, N. W. Paton, A. A. A. Fernandes, and R. Sakellariou. Distributed query processing on the Grid. In M. Parashar, editor, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Grid Computing (GRID 2002), Baltimore, MD, USA, pages 279--290. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 2536, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. P. Watson. Databases and The Grid. Technical Report CS-TR: 755, Department of computing Science, University of Newcastle, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. S. T. C. Wong and H. Huang. Authenticity techniques for PACS images and records. In SPIE 2435: Medical Imaging Proceedings---PACS Design and Evaluation, San Diego, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. S. T. C. Wong and Kent Soo Hoo. Medical imagery. In V. Castelli and L. D. Bergman, editors, Image Databases: Search and Retrieval of Digital Imagery, pages 83--105. John Wiley & Sons, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. S. T. C. Wong, Kent Soo Hoo, R. C. Knowlton, R. A. Hawkins, K. D. Laxer, D. Tjandra, and M. Abundo. Issues and applications of networked medical imaging library. International Journal of Digital Libraries, 1(3):209--218, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. C. B. Woodman, A. G. Threlfall, C. R. M. Boggis, and P. Prior. Is the three year breast screening interval too long? Occurrence of interval cancers in NHS Breast Screening Programme's North West region. British Medical Journal, 310:224--226, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. J. L. Young, C. L. Percy, and A. J. Asire. Surveillance, epidemiology, end results: Incidence and mortality data 1973--1977, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S. Zink and C. Jaffe. Medical image databases. Invest. Radiol., 28(4):366--372, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A relational approach to the capture of DICOM files for Grid-enabled medical imaging databases

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computing
          March 2004
          1733 pages
          ISBN:1581138121
          DOI:10.1145/967900

          Copyright © 2004 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 March 2004

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader