skip to main content
10.1145/984622.984659acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Estimation from lossy sensor data: jump linear modeling and Kalman filtering

Published:26 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Due to constraints in cost, power, and communication, losses often arise in large sensor networks. The sensor can be modeled as an output of a linear stochastic system with random losses of the sensor output samples. This paper considers the general problem of state estimation for jump linear systems where the discrete transitions are modeled as a Markov chain. Among other applications, this rich model can be used to analyze sensor networks. The sensor loss events are then modeled as Markov processes. Under the jump linear system model, many types of underlying losses can be easily considered, and the optimal estimator to be performed at the receiver in the presence of missing sensor data samples is given by a standard time-varying Kalman filter.We show that the asymptotic average estimation error variance converges and is given by a Linear Matrix Inequality, which can be easily solved. Under this framework, any arbitrary Markov loss process can be modeled, and its average asymptotic error variance can be directly computed. We include a few illustrative examples including .xed-length burst errors, a two-state model,and partial losses due to multiple SNR states. Our analysis encompasses modeling discrete changes not only in the received data as stated above, but also in the underlying system. In the context of the lossy sensor model, the former allows for variation in sensor positioning, power control, and loss of data communications; the latter could allow for discrete changes in the dynamics of the variable monitored by the sensor. This freedom in modeling yields a tool that is potentially valuable in various scenarios in which entities that share information are subjected to challenging and time-varying network conditions.

References

  1. C. Andrieu,M. Davy,and A. Doucet.Efficient particle filtering for jump Markov systems. application to time-varying autoregressions. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc.51(7):1762--1770, July 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. P. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan. Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. H. J. Chizeck, A. S. Willsky, and D. Castano. Discrete-time Markovian jump linear quadratic optimal control. Int. J. Contr. 43:213--31, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. O. L. V. Costa. Optimal linear filtering for discrete-time Markovian jump linear systems. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Dec. & Contr. volume 3, pages 2761--2762, Dec. 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. O. L. V. Costa and M. D. Fragaso. Stability results for discrete-time linear systems with Markovian jumping parameters. Int. J. Contr. 66:557--579, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. O. L. V. Costaand R. P. Marques. Robust H 2 control for discrete-time Markovian jump linear systems. Int. J. Contr. 73(1):11--21, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. E. de Souza and M. D. Fragoso. On the existence of a maximal solution for generalized algebraic Riccati equation arising in the stochastic control. Sys. & Contr. Letters 14:233--39,1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Dorato. Theoretical developments in discrete-time control. Automatica 19:395--400, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Doucet and C. Andrieu. state estimation of jump Markov linear systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 49(6):1216--1226, June 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Doucet, A. Logothetis, and V. Krishnamurthy. Stochastic sampling algorithms for state estimation of jump Markov linear systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 45(1):188--202, Jan. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. S. Evans and R. J. Evans. State estimation for Markov switching systems with modal observations. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Dec. & Contr. pages 1688--1693, Dec.1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. K. Fletcher, S. Rangan, V. K. Goyal, and K. Ramchandran. Robust predictive quantization: A new analysis and optimization framework. In Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inform. Th.Chicago, IL, June--July 2004. To appear.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Gastpar and M. Vetterli. Scaling laws for homogeneous sensor networks. In Proc. 41st Ann. Allerton Conf. on Commun., Control and Comp. Monticello, IL, Oct. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. N. N. Krasovskii and E. A. Lidskii. Analytical design of controllers in systems with random attributes I, II, III.Automation Remote Contr. 22:1021--1025, 1141--1146, 1289--1294, 1961.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. V. Krishnamurthy and G. G. Lin. Recursive algorithms for estimation of hidden Markov models and autoregressive models with Markov regime. IEEE Trans. Inform. Th.48(2):458--476, Feb. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. R. Kumar and P. Varaiya. Stochastic Systems: Estimation, Identification, and Adaptive Control Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Logothetis and V. Krishnamurthy. Estimation maximization algorithms for MAP estimation of jump Markov linear systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 47(8):2139--2156, Aug. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. A. Rami and L. El Ghaoui. LMI optimization for nonstandard Riccati equations arising in stochastic control. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 41:1666--1671, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. P. Seiler and R. Sengupta. Analysis of communication losses in vehicle control problems. In Proc. IEEE Amer. Contr. Conf. pages 25--27, June 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. B. Sinopoli, L. Schenato, M. Franceschetti, K. Poolla, M. I. Jordan,and S. S. Sastry. Kalman .ltering with intermittent observations. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Dec. & Contr. Maui, Hawaii, Dec. 2003. to appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. C. Smith and P. Seiler. Optimal pseudo-steady-state estimators with Markovian intermittent measurements. In Proc. IEEE Amer. Contr. Conf. pages 3021--3027, May 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. D. D. Sworder. Feedback control of a class of linear systems with jump parameters. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-14:60--63, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. W. M. Wonham. On a matrix Riccati equation of stochastic control. SIAM J. Contr.6(4):681--697, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. F. Zhao and L. J .Guibas, editors. Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Second International Workshop, IPSN 2003, Palo Alto, CA, USA, April 22-23, 2003 volume 2634 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Estimation from lossy sensor data: jump linear modeling and Kalman filtering

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IPSN '04: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks
      April 2004
      464 pages
      ISBN:1581138466
      DOI:10.1145/984622

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader