skip to main content
10.1145/988772.988818acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Simple primal-dual auctions are not possible

Published:17 May 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

de Vries et al. [3] show that if valuation function of each buyer satisfies gross substitutes condition, then we can design primal-dual auctions that implement the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) outcome. But they require prices in these auctions to be non-linear and non-anonymous. In this note, we show that such a requirement is necessary. This means, if valuation function of each buyer satisfies gross substitutes, then there does not exist a primal-dual auction which will always converge to the VCG outcome if prices in the auction are (i) linear and non-anonymous, OR (ii) non-linear and anonymous.

References

  1. M. L. Ausubel and R. P. Milgrom. Ascending auctions with package bidding. Frontiers of Theoretical Economics, 1(1):1--42, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. E. Clarke. Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice, 8:19--33, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. de Vries, J. Schummer, and R. Vohra. On ascending vickrey auctions for heterogeneous objects. Working Paper, http://www.kellogg.nwu.edu/faculty/ schummer/ftp/research, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. Groves. Incentives in Teams. Econometrica, 41:617--631, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. F. Gul and E. Stacchetti. Walrasian Equilibrium with Gross Substitutes. Journal of Economic Theory, 87(1):95--124, July 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. F. Gul and E. Stacchetti. The English Auction with Differentiated Commodities. Journal of Economic Theory, 92(1):66--95, May 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. D. Parkes and L. Ungar. An ascending-price generalized vickrey auction. Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics (SITE) Summer Workshop: The Economics of the Internet, June 2002. http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~parkes/publist.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. Journal of Finance, 16:8--37, 1961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Simple primal-dual auctions are not possible

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EC '04: Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on Electronic commerce
      May 2004
      278 pages
      ISBN:1581137710
      DOI:10.1145/988772

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 May 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Upcoming Conference

      EC '24
      The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
      July 8 - 11, 2024
      New Haven , CT , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader