skip to main content
10.1145/99186.99242acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Consultant, clone thyself!

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 August 1990Publication History

ABSTRACT

The university user community is constantly expanding and becoming more diverse. Providing high quality consulting services to this group places increased demands on centralized user services organizations. At the same time, computing centers face budgetary and time constraints. Consequently, user services organizations must employ innovative means to insure that available expertise meets user needs without reduction or degradation of service. An expert system can be the answer. This paper focuses on the development and implementation of a problem-solving expert system for the User Services staff of the University of Tennessee Computing Center. SolveIt, built with IBM's Expert System Environment, has application as both a staff training tool and a user-accessible production system. The paper concludes with a discussion of experiences from using the system and suggestions for expanding it.

References

  1. 1.See Kamran Parsaye and Mark Chignell, Expert Systems For Experts, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988, for an excellent discussion of expert systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Two presentations at last year's SiGUCCS meeting focused on expert systems. See Regina Trimm DeWitt, "Expert Systems for User Services", Procee&'ngs of ACM-SIGUCCS XVII, 1989, pp. 243-46, for a general discussion of expert systems and their applicability to user services. See Elizabeth Johnson et al, "Consulting Without Consultants: Expert Systems Applications in User Services", Proceedings of ACM- SIGUCCS XVII, 1989, pp. 335-42, for more general discussion as well as a case study of a small-scale expert system in use at the University of Wisconsin- LaCrosse. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.SolveIt began as a project in a graduate level systems policy course. The three person group which created SolveIt selected the task of cloning a consultant because they considered it to be an interesting problem, current, and relevant to a specific organization. The author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of James Kirkpatrick and Mark Watt to the initial design and development of SolveIt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Consultant, clone thyself!

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                SIGUCCS '90: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services
                August 1990
                447 pages
                ISBN:0897914066
                DOI:10.1145/99186

                Copyright © 1990 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 August 1990

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate123of170submissions,72%
              • Article Metrics

                • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
                • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

                Other Metrics

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader