Aarathi Prasad
Jacob Sorber
David Kotz
ABSTRACT
If people are not in control of the collection and sharing of their personal health information collected using mobile health (mHealth) devices and applications, privacy concerns could limit their willingness to use and reduce potential benefits provided via mHealth. We investigated users' willingness to share their personal information, collected using mHealth sensing devices, with their family, friends, third parties, and the public. Previous work employed hypothetical scenarios, surveys and interviews to understand people's information-sharing behavior; to the best of our knowledge, ours is the first privacy study where participants actually have the option to share their own information with real people. We expect our results can guide the development of privacy controls for mobile devices and applications that collect any personal and activity information, not restricted to health or fitness information.
Our study revealed three interesting findings about people's privacy concerns regarding their sensed health information: 1) We found that people share certain health information less with friends and family than with strangers, but more with specific third parties than the public. 2) Information that people were less willing to share could be information that is indirectly collected by the mobile devices. 3) We confirmed that privacy concerns are not static; mHealth device users may change their sharing decisions over time. Based on our findings, we emphasize the need for sensible default settings and flexible privacy controls to allow people to choose different settings for different recipients, and to change their sharing settings at any time.
- Affectiva. http://www.affectiva.com/, January 2011.Google Scholar
- D. Anthony, T. Henderson, and D. Kotz. Privacy in location-aware computing environments. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 6:64--72, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Baumer, J. Earp, and J. Poindexter. Quantifying privacy choices with experimental economics. In Workshop on Economics of Information Security (WEIS), 2005.Google Scholar
- M. T. Britto, T. L. Tivorsak, and G. B. Slap. Adolescents' Needs for Health Care Privacy. Pediatrics, 126(6):e1469--1476, December 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Connelly, A. Khalil, and Y. Liu. Do I Do What I Say?: Observed Versus Stated Privacy Preferences. In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT), volume 4662 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter 61, pages 620--623. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Consolvo, I. E. Smith, T. Matthews, A. LaMarca, J. Tabert, and P. Powledge. Location Disclosure to Social Relations: Why, When, & What People Want to Share. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 81--90. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Demiris, B. K. Hensel, M. Skubic, and M. Rantz. Senior Residents' Perceived Need of and Preferences for Smart Home Sensor Technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 24(01):120--124, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fitbit. http://www.fitbit.com, January 2011.Google Scholar
- J. H. Frost and M. P. Massagli. Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3):e15+, May 2008.Google Scholar
- Google Health. http://www.google.com/intl/en-US/health/about/, January 2011.Google Scholar
- Microsoft HealthVault. http://www.healthvault.com/personal/index.aspx, January 2011.Google Scholar
- C. J. Hoofnagle, J. King, S. Li, and J. Turow. How Different are Young Adults from Older Adults when it comes to Information Privacy Attitudes and Policies? Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series, April 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Jensen, C. Potts, and C. Jensen. Privacy practices of internet users: self-reports versus observed behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(1--2):203--227, July 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. C. Julie Maitland. Designing for peer involvement in weight management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Klasnja, S. Consolvo, T. Choudhury, and R. Beckwith. Exploring Privacy Concerns about Personal Sensing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive). Springer-Verlag, May 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. L. Mazurek, P. F. Klemperer, R. Shay, H. Takabi, L. Bauer, and L. F. Cranor. Exploring reactive access control. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 2085--2094. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Monica Healthcare. http://www.monicahealthcare.com, February 2011.Google Scholar
- H. Nissenbaum. Privacy in Context. Stanford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
- J. S. Olson, J. Grudin, and E. Horvitz. A study of preferences for sharing and privacy. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA), pages 1985--1988. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Prasad. Exposing Privacy Concerns in mHealth Sensing. Technical Report TR2012-711, Dartmouth College, February 2012. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/reports/TR2012-711.pdf.Google Scholar
- A. Prasad, J. Sorber, T. Stablein, D. Anthony, and D. Kotz. Exposing Privacy Concerns in mHealth Sensing. In USENIX Workshop on Health Security (HealthSec), August 2011. Position paper. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Raij, A. Ghosh, S. Kumar, and M. Srivastava. Privacy Risks Emerging from the Adoption of Innocuous Wearable Sensors in the Mobile Environment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Sadeh, J. Hong, L. Cranor, I. Fette, P. Kelley, M. Prabaker, and J. Rao. Understanding and capturing people's privacy policies in a mobile social networking application. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 13(6):401--412, Aug. 2009. Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. H. Thaler and C. R. Sunstein. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
- J. Tsai, P. Kelley, L. Cranor, and N. Sadeh. Location-Sharing Technologies: Privacy Risks and Controls. In Proceedings of the Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC), 2009.Google Scholar
- WakeMate. http://wakemate.com/, January 2011.Google Scholar
- J. Wiese, P. G. Kelley, L. F. Cranor, L. Dabbish, J. I. Hong, and J. Zimmerman. Are you close with me? Are you nearby? Investigating social groups, closeness, and willingness to share. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UBICOMP), pages 197--206, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Withings blood pressure cuff. http://www.withings.com/en/bloodpressuremonitor, November 2011.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Understanding sharing preferences and behavior for mHealth devices
Recommendations
Functional privacy concerns of older adults about pervasive health-monitoring systems
PETRA '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive EnvironmentsTechnologies designed to support ageing can be deemed to be ageist in that they often exhibit a benevolent paternalism that tries to 'protect' older people. Often this involves gathering extensive data to monitor physical and cognitive decline at the ...
What health topics older adults want to track: a participatory design study
ASSETS '13: Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and AccessibilityOlder adults are increasingly savvy consumers of smartphone-based health solutions and information. These technologies may enable older adults to age-in-place more successfully. However, many app creators fail to do needs assessments of their end-users. ...
Formative Evaluation of a Tablet Application to Support Goal-Oriented Care in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
MHCITools that can help older adults self-manage multiple health goals in collaboration with their care managers are rare to find. Informed by the Self-Determination Theory, Goal-Oriented Care paradigm and our prior findings, we used an iterative, user-...
Comments