skip to main content
10.1145/3560107.3560298acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Exploratory Diagnosis of Artificial Intelligence Risks for a Responsible Governance.

Published:18 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Our lives have been increasingly filled with technologies that use Artificial Intelligence (AI), whether at home, in public spaces, in social organizations, or in services. Like other technologies, adopting this emerging technology also requires society’s attention to the challenges that may arise from it. The media brought to the public some unexpected results from using these technologies, for example, the unfairness case in the COMPAS system. It became more evident that these technologies can have unintended consequences. In particular, in the public interest domain, these unintended consequences and their origin are a challenge for public policies, governance, and responsible AI. This work aims to identify the technological and ethical risks in data-driven decision systems based on AI and conduct a diagnosis of these risks and their perception. To do that, we use a triangulation of methods. In the first stage, a search on Web of Science has been performed. We consider all the 412 papers. The second stage corresponds to a analysis of experts. The papers have been classified according to the relevance to the topic by the experts. In the third stage, we use the survey method and include risk insights from stage two in our questions. We found 24 concerns which arise from the perspective of the ethical and technological risk perspective. The perception of participants regarding the level of concern they have with the risks of a data-driven system based on AI is high than their perception of society’s concern. Fairness is considered the risk whose perception is more severe. Fairness, Bias, Accountability, Interpretability, and Explainability are considered the most relevant concepts for a responsible AI. Consequently, also the most relevant for responsible governance of AI.

References

  1. Anne L. Ashington. 2016. compas- Propublica how To Argue With an Algorithm : Lessons From the Compas- Propublica Debate. (2016), 131–160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Edmond Awad, Sohan Dsouza, R. Kim, J. Schulz, J. Henrich, Azim Shariff, Jean-François Bonnefon, and Iyad Rahwan. 2018. The Moral Machine experiment. Nature563, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Edmond Awad, Sohan Dsouza, Azim Shariff, Iyad Rahwan, and Jean-François Bonnefon. 2020. Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 5 (2020), 2332–2337. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911517117Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Axente, M.L.2021. How do we ensure the responsible use of AI by Governments?https://digitaltechitp.nz/2021/04/07/how-do-we-ensure-the-responsible-use-of-ai-by-governments/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Marion Baylé. 2019. AI today: definition, use cases, risks, and unexpected consequences on society. https://uxdesign.cc/ai-today-definition-what-is-ai-for-risks-and-unexpected-consequences-on-society-3eda9b78a37aGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jean-François Bonnefon, Azim Shariff, and Iyad Rahwan. 2016. The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 352, 6293 (2016), 1573–1576. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2654Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. V. Dignum. 2017. "Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Designing AI for Human Values.ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries 1 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Luciano Floridi, Josh Cowls, Monica Beltrametti, Raja Chatila, Patrice Chazerand, Virginia Dignum, Christoph Luetge, Robert Madelin, Ugo Pagallo, Francesca Rossi, Burkhard Schafer, Peggy Valcke, and Effy Vayena. 2018. AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds and Machines 28, 4 (12 2018), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Luciano Floridi, Josh Cowls, Thomas C. King, and Mariarosaria Taddeo. 2020. How to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors. Science and Engineering Ethics(2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00213-5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Internantional Risk Governance Center. 2018. The Governance of Decision-Making Algorithms. Technical Report. 9–10 pages. https://irgc.epfl.ch/issues/projects-cybersecurity/the-governance-of-decision-making-algorithms/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. 2011. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 3, 2 (2011), 220–246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J.B. Kruskal. 1964. "Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method.Psychometrika 29(1964), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289694Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lydia Manikonda, Aditya Deotale, and Subbarao Kambhampati. 2018. What’s up with Privacy?: User Preferences and Privacy Concerns in Intelligent Personal Assistants. In AIES 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278773Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Maroco. 2011. "Analise Estatistica com utilizacao do SPSS.Pero Pinheiro.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Noothigattu, S. Gaikwad, Edmond Awad, S. Dsouza, I. Rahwan, P. Ravikumar, and A. Procaccia. 2018. A Voting-Based System for Ethical Decision Making, In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirtieth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Eighth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AAAI-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Web of Knowledge. 2022. Web of Science Core Collection Help. Retrieved May 2, 2022 from https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hp_research_areas_easca.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaj Sotala and Lukas Gloor. 2017. Superintelligence as a Cause or Cure for Risks of Astronomical Suffering. Technical Report. 389 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kutoma Wakunuma, George Ogoh, Damian Eke, and Simi Akintoye. 2022. Responsible AI, SDGs, and AI Governance in Africa. IST-Africa 2022 Conference Proceedings(2022).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An Exploratory Diagnosis of Artificial Intelligence Risks for a Responsible Governance.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '22: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
      October 2022
      623 pages
      ISBN:9781450396356
      DOI:10.1145/3560107

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)77
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format